162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38167700)
1. Shear bond strength of a RMGIC for orthodontic bracket bonding to enamel.
Boudrot M; François P; Abdel-Gawad S; Attal JP; Dantagnan CA
BDJ Open; 2024 Jan; 10(1):1. PubMed ID: 38167700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glass Ionomer Cements can be used for Bonding Orthodontic Brackets After Cancer Radiation Treatment?
Santin GC; Queiroz AM; Palma-Dibb RG; Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; Romano FL
Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(2):128-132. PubMed ID: 29898057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of bromelain and papain gel on enamel deproteinisation before orthodontic bracket bonding.
Pithon MM; Campos MS; Coqueiro Rda S
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 27468588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of fluoride-releasing orthodontic adhesives on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to eroded enamel following different surface treatment protocols.
Althagafi NM
J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():3. PubMed ID: 35282290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 19793779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.
Francois P; Vennat E; Le Goff S; Ruscassier N; Attal JP; Dursun E
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2599-2608. PubMed ID: 30317399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear Bond Strength of Molar Tubes to Enamel Using an Orthodontic Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Amorphous Calcium Phosphate.
Tanbakuchi B; Hooshmand T; Javad Kharazifard M; Shekofteh K; Hesam Arefi A
Front Dent; 2019; 16(5):369-378. PubMed ID: 32123877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded with hydrophilic and hydrophobic bond systems under contamination.
Santos BM; Pithon MM; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):963-7. PubMed ID: 20578870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of RMGI and Composite Resin for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding.
Yassaei S; Davari A; Goldani Moghadam M; Kamaei A
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 25628663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study.
Hadrous R; Bouserhal J; Osman E
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):461-468. PubMed ID: 31278045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-component self-etching primer: a seventh generation of orthodontic bonding system?
Pithon MM; dos Santos RL; Ruellas AC; Sant'Anna EF
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 20164128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bracket bond strength and cariostatic potential of an experimental resin adhesive system containing Portland cement.
Iijima M; Hashimoto M; Nakagaki S; Muguruma T; Kohda N; Endo K; Mizoguchi I
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 22229824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between RMGIC and composite with acid-etch preparation or hypochlorite on the adhesion of a premolar metal bracket by testing SBS and ARI: In vitro study.
Ghoubril V; Ghoubril J; Khoury E
Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 31495756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A self-conditioner for resin-modified glass ionomers in bonding orthodontic brackets.
Bishara SE; Ostby AW; Laffoon J; Warren JJ
Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul; 77(4):711-5. PubMed ID: 17605493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of dynamic fatigue loading on the separate components of the bracket-cement-enamel system.
Algera TJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Feilzer AJ
Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 18795520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of New Adhesion Promoters on Compromised Hypocalcified Enamel.
Vamsilatha K; Venkata KM; Aileni KR; Sashidhar NR
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Jul; 9(7):ZC09-11. PubMed ID: 26393196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
