These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38168815)

  • 1. Relapse and failure rates between CAD/CAM and conventional fixed retainers: a 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Tran G; Rucker R; Foley P; Bankhead B; Adel SM; Kim KB
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 38168815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative assessment of relapse and failure between CAD/CAM stainless steel and standard stainless steel fixed retainers in orthodontic retention patients.
    Shim H; Foley P; Bankhead B; Kim KB
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Jan; 92(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 34464438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Pullisaar H; Cattaneo PM; Gera A; Sankiewicz M; Bilińska M; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Cornelis MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; 46(2):. PubMed ID: 38394353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Gera A; Pullisaar H; Cattaneo PM; Gera S; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Cornelis MA
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 35964235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of CAD/CAM-based fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Bardideh E; Ghorbani M; Shafaee H; Saeedi P; Younessian F
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Sep; 45(5):545-557. PubMed ID: 37471113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of CAD/CAM Technology in Interventions Implemented in Orthodontics: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials.
    Ardila CM; Elorza-Durán A; Arrubla-Escobar D
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():5310555. PubMed ID: 35692590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial.
    Alrawas MB; Kashoura Y; Tosun Ö; Öz U
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 May; 24(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 32865325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of chairside rectangular chain retainers and multi-stranded conventional retainers: a randomized controlled trial.
    Waldenström S; Qaljaee J; Bresin A; Esmaili S; Westerlund A
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 39011818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Innovative customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer versus standard stainless-steel lingual retainer: A randomized controlled trial.
    Gelin E; Seidel L; Bruwier A; Albert A; Charavet C
    Korean J Orthod; 2020 Nov; 50(6):373-382. PubMed ID: 33144526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CAD/CAM nitinol bonded retainer versus a chairside rectangular-chain bonded retainer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Jowett AC; Littlewood SJ; Hodge TM; Dhaliwal HK; Wu J
    J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 50(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 36062600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers : A prospective short-term study.
    Kartal Y; Kaya B; Polat-Özsoy Ö
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Jan; 82(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 32780168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers.
    Arash V; Teimoorian M; Farajzadeh Jalali Y; Sheikhzadeh S
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Jun; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 32596755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of an randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers.
    Çokakoğlu S; Adanur-Atmaca R; Çakır M; Öztürk F
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Apr; 27(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 37786933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    O'Rourke N; Albeedh H; Sharma P; Johal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Sep; 150(3):406-15. PubMed ID: 27585768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 1. Stability, retainer failure, and participant satisfaction.
    Jasim ES; Kadhum AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39206494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability of maxillary anterior teeth during retention and 1 year after removal of retention-an RCT on adolescents retained with two different bonded retainers and a vacuum-formed retainer.
    Naraghi S; Ganzer N; Bondemark L; Sonesson M
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):629-636. PubMed ID: 37119264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-treatment stability after 5 years of retention with vacuum-formed and bonded retainers-a randomized controlled trial.
    Krämer A; Sjöström M; Apelthun C; Hallman M; Feldmann I
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 35968668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers- a randomized clinical trial".
    Nagani NI; Ahmed I; Tanveer F; Khursheed HM; Farooqui WA
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):180. PubMed ID: 32600325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elemental composition, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers.
    Namura Y; Pullisaar H; Holm HV; Syverud M; Mulic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    J Oral Sci; 2024 Apr; 66(2):107-110. PubMed ID: 38403676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective randomized controlled trial on the comparative clinical efficiency and hygiene of a ceramic inter locking retainer and a flexible spiral wire bonded retainer.
    Sinha A; Sonar S; Batra P; Raghavan S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 34810385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.