199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38169097)
21. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcomes and Complications of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Attia AK; Mahmoud K; d'Hooghe P; Bariteau J; Labib SA; Myerson MS
Am J Sports Med; 2023 Mar; 51(3):825-836. PubMed ID: 34908499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mini-invasive
Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A meta-analysis of cervical foraminotomy: open versus minimally-invasive techniques.
McAnany SJ; Kim JS; Overley SC; Baird EO; Anderson PA; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):849-56. PubMed ID: 25623079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing minimally invasive surgical and open approaches to pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies - Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ryan OK; Doogan KL; Ryan ÉJ; Donnelly M; Reynolds IS; Creavin B; Davey MG; Kelly ME; Kennelly R; Hanly A; Martin ST; Winter DC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 37087374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].
Pu XY; Luo WY; Gao MX; Ma GF; Zhang C; Chi F; Qian YW
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2022 May; 35(5):409-17. PubMed ID: 35535527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in high-risk histologic endometrial cancer patients: A meta-analysis.
Kim NR; Lee AJ; Yang EJ; So KA; Lee SJ; Kim TJ; Shim SH
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):236-244. PubMed ID: 35725657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Pranata R; Lim MA; Vania R; Bagus Mahadewa TG
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e264-e274. PubMed ID: 33418123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prevalence of different types of wound infection in subjects with Parkinson's disease and total joint arthroplasty: A meta-Analysis.
Wang Y; Wang S; Yang X
Int Wound J; 2023 Sep; 20(7):2780-2787. PubMed ID: 36924416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Platt A; Fessler RG; Traynelis VC; O'Toole JE
Global Spine J; 2022 Sep; 12(7):1573-1582. PubMed ID: 34879736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of outcomes following minimally invasive and open posterior cervical foraminotomy: description of minimally invasive technique and review of literature.
Platt A; Gerard CS; O'Toole JE
J Spine Surg; 2020 Mar; 6(1):243-251. PubMed ID: 32309662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of Clindamycin compared with Ampicillin-Sulbactam as prophylactic antibiotics for wound infections following major surgery for head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis.
Hu Y; Yan A; Jiang F
Int Wound J; 2023 Dec; 20(10):4151-4158. PubMed ID: 37483017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of diabetic foot ulcers and other risk factors on the prevalence of lower extremity amputation: A meta-analysis.
Zhang H; Huang C; Bai J; Wang J
Int Wound J; 2023 Oct; 20(8):3035-3047. PubMed ID: 37095728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimally Invasive Surgery is Superior to Conventional Craniotomy in Patients with Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Xia Z; Wu X; Li J; Liu Z; Chen F; Zhang L; Zhang H; Wan X; Cheng Q
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 115():266-273. PubMed ID: 29730105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
