BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38169097)

  • 41. The impacts of minimally invasive surgery on intermediate- or high-risk cervical cancer patients received adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Zhang Q; Liu Z; Wang Y; Zhang J; Li W; Wang T; Wang J; Shi F; Su J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Nov; 20(1):372. PubMed ID: 36443879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy on wound infection in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.
    Guo D; Liao F; Yang L; Liu B; Chen L
    Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14598. PubMed ID: 38272810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in high-risk histologic endometrial cancer patients: A meta-analysis.
    Kim NR; Lee AJ; Yang EJ; So KA; Lee SJ; Kim TJ; Shim SH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):236-244. PubMed ID: 35725657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Risk Factors for Major Complications Following Minimally Invasive Surgeries for Endometriosis in the United States.
    Meyer R; Siedhoff M; Truong M; Hamilton K; Fan S; Levin G; Barnajian M; Nasseri Y; Wright K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 30(10):820-826. PubMed ID: 37321298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mini-invasive
    Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Postoperative venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery: Does modality matter?
    Wagar MK; Sobecki JN; Chandereng T; Hartenbach EM; Wallace SK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 162(3):751-755. PubMed ID: 34148718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Pranata R; Lim MA; Vania R; Bagus Mahadewa TG
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e264-e274. PubMed ID: 33418123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism after minimally invasive surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer is low: a multi-institutional study.
    Kumar S; Al-Wahab Z; Sarangi S; Woelk J; Morris R; Munkarah A; Dowdy SC; Mariani A; Cliby W
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 23612315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparing minimally invasive surgical and open approaches to pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies - Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ryan OK; Doogan KL; Ryan ÉJ; Donnelly M; Reynolds IS; Creavin B; Davey MG; Kelly ME; Kennelly R; Hanly A; Martin ST; Winter DC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 37087374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Prevalence of different types of wound infection in subjects with Parkinson's disease and total joint arthroplasty: A meta-Analysis.
    Wang Y; Wang S; Yang X
    Int Wound J; 2023 Sep; 20(7):2780-2787. PubMed ID: 36924416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relationship between vitamin D deficiency and diabetic foot ulcer: A meta-analysis.
    Li X; Kou S; Chen G; Zhao B; Xue J; Ding R; Zhao X; Ye M; Yang Y; Yue R; Li F
    Int Wound J; 2023 Oct; 20(8):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 37194326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao MM; Cibula D; Wu X; Falconer H; Persson J; Perrotta M; Mosgaard BJ; Kucukmetin A; Berlev I; Rendon G; Liu K; Vieira M; Capilna ME; Fotopoulou C; Baiocchi G; Kaidarova D; Ribeiro R; Pedra-Nobre S; Kocian R; Li X; Li J; Pálsdóttir K; Noll F; Rundle S; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Gheorghe M; Saso S; Bolatbekova R; Tsunoda A; Pitcher B; Wu J; Urbauer D; Pareja R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):97.e1-97.e16. PubMed ID: 34461074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
    Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Minimally invasive surgery and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Yu Y; Deng T; Gu S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 May; 157(2):255-264. PubMed ID: 34165795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Role of minimally invasive surgery versus open approach in patients with early-stage uterine carcinosarcomas: a retrospective multicentric study.
    Corrado G; Ciccarone F; Cosentino F; Legge F; Rosati A; Arcieri M; Turco LC; Certelli C; Federico A; Vizza E; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2021 Mar; 147(3):845-852. PubMed ID: 32880752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Association between timing of cervical excision procedure to minimally invasive hysterectomy and surgical complications.
    Sullivan SA; Clark LH; Staley AS; Tran AQ; Winn A; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):294-298. PubMed ID: 27894753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery on Treating Patients with Early Cervical Adenocarcinoma.
    Zhu H; Yan Y; Liu Y; Meng L
    J Invest Surg; 2022 Jul; 35(7):1593-1601. PubMed ID: 35437114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of the Efficacy of Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery on Children with Neuroblastoma: A Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang R; Fang YF; Wu DM; Lin Y; Zhang B; Liu MK; Bai JX; Chen F
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Jul; 31(7):829-838. PubMed ID: 34076504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.