135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38169191)
41. Patient positioning and port placement for robot-assisted surgery.
Chang C; Steinberg Z; Shah A; Gundeti MS
J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):631-8. PubMed ID: 24548088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Single port robot-assisted pyeloplasty: An early comparative outcomes analysis.
Ditonno F; Franco A; Manfredi C; Feng CL; Bologna E; Licari LC; Olweny EO; Vourganti S; Cherullo EE; Chow AK; Autorino R
Int J Med Robot; 2024 Feb; 20(1):e2622. PubMed ID: 38536721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Technical aspects of laparoscopic robot-assisted pyeloplasty].
Ferhi K; Rouprêt M; Rode J; Misraï V; Lebeau T; Richard F; Vaessen C
Prog Urol; 2009 Oct; 19(9):606-10. PubMed ID: 19800549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system.
Gettman MT; Neururer R; Bartsch G; Peschel R
Urology; 2002 Sep; 60(3):509-13. PubMed ID: 12350499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children.
Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Single-Port
Gu L; Li Y; Li X; Liu W
J Endourol; 2023 Jun; 37(6):681-687. PubMed ID: 37051695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).
González ST; Rosito TE; Tur AB; Ruiz J; Gozalbez R; Maiolo A; Tavares PM; Gorgen ARH; de Kencht EL; Madarriaga YQ; Weller S; Tobia IP; Castellan M; Corbetta JP
Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(6):961-968. PubMed ID: 36083265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Modified Laparoscopic and Robotic Flap Pyeloplasty for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with a Long Proximal Ureteral Stricture: The "Wishbone" Anastomosis and the "Ureteral Plate" Technique.
Cheng S; Li X; Yang K; Xiong S; Li Z; Zhu H; Zhang P; Li X; Guan H; Li Z; Hao H; Zhang L; Li X; Zhou L
Urol Int; 2021; 105(7-8):642-649. PubMed ID: 33567431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Are robots the future? A case for robotic pyeloplasty as the gold standard treatment in ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Beale R; Sicilila S; Riestra P; Albala DM
Curr Opin Urol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 34798638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Robotic versus open pyeloplasty in pediatric patients: a single center experience in Saudi Arabia.
Junejo NN; Vallasciani S; Alshammari A; Aljallad H; Alshahrani S; Abasher A; Almathami A; Alhazmi H
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Oct; 70(5):486-493. PubMed ID: 29856170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A 10 Year Experience in a Single Institution.
Whiting D; Whitehurst L; Tsang D; Hussain M; Malki M; Barber N
J Endourol; 2022 May; 36(5):615-619. PubMed ID: 34931543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Human capital gains associated with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children compared to open pyeloplasty.
Behan JW; Kim SS; Dorey F; De Filippo RE; Chang AY; Hardy BE; Koh CJ
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4 Suppl):1663-7. PubMed ID: 21862079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in five pediatric cases of pelvic kidneys.
Muller CO; Blanc T; Peycelon M; El Ghoneimi A
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):353.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26233554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Surgical outcome of 100 consecutive robot-assisted pyeloplasty cases with no drainage placement for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Mari A; Sforza S; Morselli S; Campi R; Masieri L; Carini M; Minervini A
Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):700-701. PubMed ID: 29855093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Excision of Ureteral and Ureteropelvic Junction Fibroepithelial Polyps in Children.
Osbun N; Ellison JS; Lendvay TS
J Endourol; 2016 Aug; 30(8):896-900. PubMed ID: 27279495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Robotic pyeloplasty: first experiences].
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo G
Cir Pediatr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):124-8. PubMed ID: 24482904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Technology Based Treatment for UreteroPelvic Junction Obstruction.
Lai WR; Stewart CA; Thomas R
J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(S1):S59-S63. PubMed ID: 27549028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
