These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38169777)

  • 1. Commentary: Direct estimation of central aortic pressure from measured or quantified mean and diastolic brachial blood pressure: agreement with invasive records.
    Chemla D; Jozwiak M
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1295467. PubMed ID: 38169777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct estimation of central aortic pressure from measured or quantified mean and diastolic brachial blood pressure: agreement with invasive records.
    Bia D; Salazar F; Cinca L; Gutierrez M; Facta A; Zócalo Y; Diaz A
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1207069. PubMed ID: 37560119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brachial Blood Pressure Invasively and Non-Invasively Obtained Using Oscillometry and Applanation Tonometry: Impact of Mean Blood Pressure Equations and Calibration Schemes on Agreement Levels.
    Bia D; Zócalo Y; Sánchez R; Torrado JF; Lev G; Mendiz O; Pessana F; Ramírez A; Cabrera-Fischer EI
    J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2023 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 36826541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central-to-peripheral blood pressure amplification: role of the recording site, technology, analysis approach, and calibration scheme in invasive and non-invasive data agreement.
    Zócalo Y; Bia D; Sánchez R; Lev G; Mendiz O; Ramirez A; Cabrera-Fischer EI
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1256221. PubMed ID: 37886732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Rajani R; Chowienczyk P; Redwood S; Guilcher A; Chambers JB
    J Hypertens; 2008 Dec; 26(12):2381-8. PubMed ID: 19008716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic systolic and pulse pressure invasively and non-invasively obtained: Comparative analysis of recording techniques, arterial sites of measurement, waveform analysis algorithms and calibration methods.
    Bia D; Zócalo Y; Sánchez R; Lev G; Mendiz O; Pessana F; Ramirez A; Cabrera-Fischer EI
    Front Physiol; 2023; 14():1113972. PubMed ID: 36726850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
    Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-Invasive Estimation of Central Systolic Blood Pressure by Radial Tonometry: A Simplified Approach.
    Chemla D; Agnoletti D; Jozwiak M; Zhang Y; Protogerou AD; Millasseau S; Blacher J
    J Pers Med; 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37623496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of central aortic pressure by SphygmoCor requires intra-arterial peripheral pressures.
    Cloud GC; Rajkumar C; Kooner J; Cooke J; Bulpitt CJ
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2003 Aug; 105(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 12710885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of central pulse pressure estimated from pulse wave propagation velocity and carotid pulse pressure measured by applantation tonometry].
    Chemaly E; London G; Benetos A; Darné B; Asmar R
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2002; 95(7-8):637-40. PubMed ID: 12365071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy Difference of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements by Sex and Height.
    Abbaoui Y; Fortier C; Desbiens LC; Kowalski C; Lamarche F; Nadeau-Fredette AC; Madore F; Agharazii M; Goupil R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jun; 5(6):e2215513. PubMed ID: 35671057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimated aortic blood pressure based on radial artery tonometry underestimates directly measured aortic blood pressure in patients with advancing chronic kidney disease staging and increasing arterial stiffness.
    Carlsen RK; Peters CD; Khatir DS; Laugesen E; Bøtker HE; Winther S; Buus NH
    Kidney Int; 2016 Oct; 90(4):869-77. PubMed ID: 27401535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform features derived from the brachial cuff volume displacement waveform.
    Butlin M; Qasem A; Avolio AP
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():2591-4. PubMed ID: 23366455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of the N-point moving average method for brachial pressure waveform-derived estimation of central aortic systolic pressure.
    Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
    Hypertension; 2014 Apr; 63(4):865-70. PubMed ID: 24420554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-invasive model-based estimation of aortic pulse pressure using suprasystolic brachial pressure waveforms.
    Lowe A; Harrison W; El-Aklouk E; Ruygrok P; Al-Jumaily AM
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2111-5. PubMed ID: 19665136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central aortic blood pressure from ultrasound wall-tracking of the carotid artery in children: comparison with invasive measurements and radial tonometry.
    Milne L; Keehn L; Guilcher A; Reidy JF; Karunanithy N; Rosenthal E; Qureshi S; Chowienczyk PJ; Sinha MD
    Hypertension; 2015 May; 65(5):1141-6. PubMed ID: 25824246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central aortic blood pressure estimation in children and adolescents: results of the KidCoreBP study.
    Mynard JP; Goldsmith G; Springall G; Eastaugh L; Lane GK; Zannino D; Smolich JJ; Avolio A; Cheung MMH
    J Hypertens; 2020 May; 38(5):821-828. PubMed ID: 31790068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement accuracy of non-invasively obtained central blood pressure by applanation tonometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cheng HM; Lang D; Tufanaru C; Pearson A
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(5):1867-76. PubMed ID: 22622052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
    Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiscale mathematical modeling vs. the generalized transfer function approach for aortic pressure estimation: a comparison with invasive data.
    Guala A; Tosello F; Leone D; Sabia L; D'Ascenzo F; Moretti C; Bollati M; Veglio F; Ridolfi L; Milan A
    Hypertens Res; 2019 May; 42(5):690-698. PubMed ID: 30531842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.