These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38170292)

  • 1. Forest carbon stock development following extreme drought-induced dieback of coniferous stands in Central Europe: a CBM-CFS3 model application.
    Cienciala E; Melichar J
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2024 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 38170292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modelling forest carbon stock changes as affected by harvest and natural disturbances. II. EU-level analysis.
    Pilli R; Grassi G; Kurz WA; Moris JV; Viñas RA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2016 Dec; 11(1):20. PubMed ID: 27635153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Historical effects of dissolved organic carbon export and land management decisions on the watershed-scale forest carbon budget of a coastal British Columbia Douglas-fir-dominated landscape.
    Smiley BP; Trofymow JA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2017 Dec; 12(1):15. PubMed ID: 28707260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systems approach to assess climate change mitigation options in landscapes of the United States forest sector.
    Dugan AJ; Birdsey R; Mascorro VS; Magnan M; Smyth CE; Olguin M; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 30182168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatiotemporal dynamics of forest ecosystem carbon budget in Guizhou: customisation and application of the CBM-CFS3 model for China.
    Tang Y; Shao Q; Shi T; Lu Z; Wu G
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2022 Jul; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 35779178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Climate change mitigation in Canada's forest sector: a spatially explicit case study for two regions.
    Smyth CE; Smiley BP; Magnan M; Birdsey R; Dugan AJ; Olguin M; Mascorro VS; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 30187146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the CO
    Knauf M; Köhl M; Mues V; Olschofsky K; Frühwald A
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2015 Dec; 10():13. PubMed ID: 26097501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European forests under global climate change: Review of tree growth processes, crises and management strategies.
    Vacek Z; Vacek S; Cukor J
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Apr; 332():117353. PubMed ID: 36716544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of Cross-Sector Interactions When Projecting Forest Carbon across Alternative Socioeconomic Futures.
    Jones JPH; Baker JS; Austin K; Latta G; Wade CM; Cai Y; Aramayo-Lipa L; Beach R; Ohrel SB; Ragnauth S; Creason J; Cole J
    J For Econ; 2019; 34(3-4):205-231. PubMed ID: 32280189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of forests in the EU climate policy: are we on the right track?
    Korosuo A; Pilli R; Abad Viñas R; Blujdea VNB; Colditz RR; Fiorese G; Rossi S; Vizzarri M; Grassi G
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2023 Jul; 18(1):15. PubMed ID: 37517072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EU mitigation potential of harvested wood products.
    Pilli R; Fiorese G; Grassi G
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2015 Dec; 10(1):6. PubMed ID: 26457115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Climate change mitigation in British Columbia's forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts.
    Smyth CE; Xu Z; Lemprière TC; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2020 Oct; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 33001303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two large-scale forest scenario modelling approaches for reporting CO
    Blujdea VNB; Sikkema R; Dutca I; Nabuurs GJ
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2021 Aug; 16(1):25. PubMed ID: 34417647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the implications of the EU-LULUCF regulation for the wood supply from EU forests to the EU.
    Nabuurs GJ; Arets EJMM; Schelhaas MJ
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Oct; 13(1):18. PubMed ID: 30328011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving carbon monitoring and reporting in forests using spatially-explicit information.
    Boisvenue C; Smiley BP; White JC; Kurz WA; Wulder MA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2016 Dec; 11(1):23. PubMed ID: 27853482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carbon costs and benefits of France's biomass energy production targets.
    Valade A; Luyssaert S; Vallet P; Njakou Djomo S; Jesus Van Der Kellen I; Bellassen V
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Dec; 13(1):26. PubMed ID: 30547241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Science-based approach for credible accounting of mitigation in managed forests.
    Grassi G; Pilli R; House J; Federici S; Kurz WA
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 May; 13(1):8. PubMed ID: 29774443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Opportunities for forest sector emissions reductions: a state-level analysis.
    Dugan AJ; Lichstein JW; Steele A; Metsaranta JM; Bick S; Hollinger DY
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02327. PubMed ID: 33742488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling forest carbon stock changes as affected by harvest and natural disturbances. I. Comparison with countries' estimates for forest management.
    Pilli R; Grassi G; Kurz WA; Viñas RA; Guerrero NH
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2016 Dec; 11(1):5. PubMed ID: 27340427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating New Zealand's harvested wood products carbon stocks and stock changes.
    Wakelin SJ; Searles N; Lawrence D; Paul TSH
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2020 May; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 32440735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.