These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38171060)
1. On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility. Kemp PL; Goldman AC; Wahlheim CN Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101783. PubMed ID: 38171060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recalling fake news during real news corrections can impair or enhance memory updating: the role of recollection-based retrieval. Kemp PL; Alexander TR; Wahlheim CN Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Sep; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 36114359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term. Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Memory failure predicts belief regression after the correction of misinformation. Swire-Thompson B; Dobbs M; Thomas A; DeGutis J Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105276. PubMed ID: 36174261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news. Kemp PL; Sinclair AH; Adcock RA; Wahlheim CN Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):28. PubMed ID: 38713308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correcting eyewitness suggestibility: does explanatory role predict resistance to correction? Braun BE; Zaragoza MS; Chrobak QM; Ithisuphalap J Memory; 2021 Jan; 29(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 33290185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining the replicability of backfire effects after standalone corrections. Prike T; Blackley P; Swire-Thompson B; Ecker UKH Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jul; 8(1):39. PubMed ID: 37395864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect. Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S; Chadwick M Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):41. PubMed ID: 32844338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation. Pluviano S; Della Sala S; Watt C Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 32333126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Listening to Misinformation while Driving: Cognitive Load and the Effectiveness of (Repeated) Corrections. Sanderson JA; Bowden V; Swire-Thompson B; Lewandowsky S; Ecker UKH J Appl Res Mem Cogn; 2023 Sep; 12(3):325-334. PubMed ID: 37829768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions. Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect. Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correcting vaccine misinformation: A failure to replicate familiarity or fear-driven backfire effects. Ecker UKH; Sharkey CXM; Swire-Thompson B PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0281140. PubMed ID: 37043493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Credibility of misinformation source moderates the effectiveness of corrective messages on social media. Zeng HK; Lo SY; Li SS Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jul; 33(5):587-603. PubMed ID: 38160402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation. Johnson HM; Seifert CM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1483-94. PubMed ID: 9835062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]