These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38171060)

  • 21. Are witnesses able to avoid highly accessible misinformation? Examining the efficacy of different warnings for high and low accessibility postevent misinformation.
    Bulevich JB; Gordon LT; Hughes GI; Thomas AK
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 34997479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examining the role of information integration in the continued influence effect using an event segmentation approach.
    Sanderson JA; Farrell S; Ecker UKH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271566. PubMed ID: 35849610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Challenging depressive beliefs: Habitual and recollective components of stability or change.
    Hertel P; Acuff MC; Hernandez J; Poppe E
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2022 Sep; 76():101742. PubMed ID: 35738689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. You don't have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections.
    Ecker UKH; Butler LH; Hamby A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Dec; 5(1):64. PubMed ID: 33300094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding.
    Karanian JM; Thomas AK; Race E
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):440-452. PubMed ID: 38504050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories.
    Zhu B; Chen C; Loftus EF; Lin C; Dong Q
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Aug; 41(6):832-8. PubMed ID: 23397226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does emotional or repeated misinformation increase memory distortion for a trauma analogue event?
    Nahleen S; Strange D; Takarangi MKT
    Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2453-2465. PubMed ID: 32885342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics.
    Echterhoff G; Hirst W; Hussy W
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):770-82. PubMed ID: 16383166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Levels-of-processing effects on context and target recollection for words and pictures.
    Nieznański M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103127. PubMed ID: 32603912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiple-choice quizzes improve memory for misinformation debunks, but do not reduce belief in misinformation.
    Collier JR; Pillai RM; Fazio LK
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jun; 8(1):37. PubMed ID: 37278735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Keeping track of 'alternative facts': The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections.
    Gordon A; Quadflieg S; Brooks JCW; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():46-56. PubMed ID: 30872047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hope over fear: The interplay between threat information and hope appeal corrections in debunking early COVID-19 misinformation.
    Tao R; Li J; Shen L; Yang S
    Soc Sci Med; 2023 Sep; 333():116132. PubMed ID: 37556993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influences of misleading postevent information: misinformation interference and acceptance.
    Belli RF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 2522507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does explaining the origins of misinformation improve the effectiveness of a given correction?
    Connor Desai S; Reimers S
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):422-436. PubMed ID: 36125658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correcting COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in 10 countries.
    Porter E; Velez Y; Wood TJ
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Mar; 10(3):221097. PubMed ID: 36938534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of correcting misinformation on social disruption.
    Iizuka R; Toriumi F; Nishiguchi M; Takano M; Yoshida M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265734. PubMed ID: 35377890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Undoing suggestive influence on memory: the reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect.
    Oeberst A; Blank H
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 22883683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigation of the determinants for misinformation correction effectiveness on social media during COVID-19 pandemic.
    Zhang Y; Guo B; Ding Y; Liu J; Qiu C; Liu S; Yu Z
    Inf Process Manag; 2022 May; 59(3):102935. PubMed ID: 35400028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm.
    Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forming and updating vaccination beliefs: does the continued effect of misinformation depend on what we think we know?
    Pluviano S; Watt C; Pompéia S; Ekuni R; Della Sala S
    Cogn Process; 2022 Aug; 23(3):367-378. PubMed ID: 35583578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.