151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38171516)
1. [Comparison of clear aligners and customized lingual appliance for bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: a retrospective study].
Li ZX; Yuan LJ; Zheng XW; Liu L; Liu C; Fang B
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Oct; 32(5):480-484. PubMed ID: 38171516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical efficacy of clear aligners in treating bimaxillary protrusion].
Guan X; Chang DT; Yan Y; Zhang YW; Zhou YH; Song Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 52(9):549-553. PubMed ID: 29972919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of maxillary incisor retraction effects for patients with first premolar extractions between Damon Q and Invisalign®: A retrospective study.
Chen J; Wen J; Huang L; Zhang L; Han L; Li H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Oct; 101(40):e30919. PubMed ID: 36221412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-orthodontic cephalometric variations in bimaxillary protrusion cases managed by premolar extraction - A retrospective study.
Alqahtani ND; Alshammari R; Almoammar K; Almosa N; Almahdy A; Albarakati SF
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1530-1538. PubMed ID: 31719274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Control of lower incisor inclination with a completely customized lingual appliance for dentoalveolar compensation of class III malocclusion.
Lossdörfer S; Schwestka-Polly R; Wiechmann D
J Orofac Orthop; 2013 Sep; 74(5):381-96. PubMed ID: 23974440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [
Zhou ZJ; Chen Y; Lin YJ; Sun YT; Wang TG; Mao LX; Liu JQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 34645237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Herbst appliance combined with a completely customized lingual appliance: A retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
Mujagic M; Pandis N; Fleming PS; Katsaros C
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 32839142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative assessment of the dentoskeletal effects of clear aligners vs miniplate-supported posterior intrusion with fixed appliances in adult patients with anterior open bite. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study.
Steele BP; Pandis N; Darendeliler MA; Papadopoulou AK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Aug; 162(2):214-228.e4. PubMed ID: 35339320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.
Solem RC; Marasco R; Guiterrez-Pulido L; Nielsen I; Kim SH; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):218-28. PubMed ID: 23910203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction.
Bills DA; Handelman CS; BeGole EA
Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 15898369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidisciplinary treatment with a customized lingual appliance for an adult patient with severe Class III malocclusion and multiple missing teeth.
Gallone M; Robiony M; Bordonali D; Bruno G; De Stefani A; Gracco A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):401-411. PubMed ID: 31474270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of an adult patient with missing one mandibular incisor, severe overjet, and midline discrepancy with asymmetric extraction, lingual appliance, and skeletal anchorage: A case report.
Nguyen VA; Nguyen TT; Nguyen TTH
J World Fed Orthod; 2020 Jun; 9(2):86-94. PubMed ID: 32672660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental and soft tissue changes following extraction of second premolars in females with bimaxillary protrusion: A retrospective study.
Alqahtani ND; Alqasir A; Al-Jewair T; Almoammar K; Albarakati SF
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 32788489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. G-Block: Posterior anchorage device tads-supported after molar distalization with aligners: An adult case report.
Greco M; Rossini G; Rombolà A
Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100687. PubMed ID: 36153240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative assessment of orthodontic clear aligner versus fixed appliance for anterior retraction: a finite element study.
Xia Q; Wang W; Wang C; Feng G; Wang C; Song J; Fan Y
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):80. PubMed ID: 38218801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
