These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Degree of polarization in Young's double-slit interference experiment formed by stochastic electromagnetic beams. Chen Z; Pu J J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Jul; 24(7):2043-8. PubMed ID: 17728828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Generation of complete coherence in Young's interference experiment with random mutually uncorrelated electromagnetic beams. Agarwal GS; Dogariu A; Visser TD; Wolf E Opt Lett; 2005 Jan; 30(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 15675686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaction of two singular Lissajous lines in free space. Chen H; Gao Z; Wang W Appl Opt; 2017 May; 56(15):4261-4266. PubMed ID: 29047848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cycle of phase, coherence and polarization singularities in Young's three-pinhole experiment. Pang X; Gbur G; Visser TD Opt Express; 2015 Dec; 23(26):34093-108. PubMed ID: 26832065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stokes parameters and polarization contrasts in Young's interference experiment. Setälä T; Tervo J; Friberg AT Opt Lett; 2006 Jul; 31(14):2208-10. PubMed ID: 16794728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New effects in Young's interference experiment with partially coherent light. Schouten HF; Visser TD; Wolf E Opt Lett; 2003 Jul; 28(14):1182-4. PubMed ID: 12885014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polarization singularities in superposition of vector beams. Vyas S; Kozawa Y; Sato S Opt Express; 2013 Apr; 21(7):8972-86. PubMed ID: 23571988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Young's interference experiment with electromagnetic narrowband light. Partanen H; Hoenders BJ; Friberg AT; Setälä T J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Aug; 35(8):1379-1384. PubMed ID: 30110299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phase singularities, correlation singularities, and conditions for complete destructive interference. Rosenbury C; Gu Y; Gbur G J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Apr; 29(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 22472815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of coherence singularities in polarization singular beams. Joshi S; Khan SN; Senthilkumaran P Appl Opt; 2024 Jan; 63(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 38175004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electric and magnetic polarization singularities of first-order Laguerre-Gaussian beams diffracted at a half-plane screen. Luo Y; Gao Z; Tang B; Lü B J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Aug; 30(8):1646-53. PubMed ID: 24323225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hexagonal vector field of polarization singularities with a gradient basis structure. Pal SK; Senthilkumaran P Opt Lett; 2019 Apr; 44(8):2093-2096. PubMed ID: 30985819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Young's interference fringes with narrow-band light. Wolf E Opt Lett; 1983 May; 8(5):250-2. PubMed ID: 19718077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Managing focal fields of vector beams with multiple polarization singularities. Han L; Liu S; Li P; Zhang Y; Cheng H; Gan X; Zhao J Appl Opt; 2016 Nov; 55(32):9049-9053. PubMed ID: 27857288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Equivalence between optimum Young's fringe visibility and position-independent stochastic behavior of electromagnetic fields. Martínez-Herrero R; Mejías PM J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Aug; 25(8):1902-5. PubMed ID: 18677352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]