BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38177786)

  • 21. Improving protein-ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term.
    Zheng L; Meng J; Jiang K; Lan H; Wang Z; Lin M; Li W; Guo H; Wei Y; Mu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35289359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predicting Drug-Target Interaction Using a Novel Graph Neural Network with 3D Structure-Embedded Graph Representation.
    Lim J; Ryu S; Park K; Choe YJ; Ham J; Kim WY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3981-3988. PubMed ID: 31443612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Equivariant Line Graph Neural Network for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Yi Y; Wan X; Zhao K; Ou-Yang L; Zhao P
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2024 Jul; 28(7):4336-4347. PubMed ID: 38551822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Protein-Ligand Docking in the Machine-Learning Era.
    Yang C; Chen EA; Zhang Y
    Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ligand binding affinity prediction with fusion of graph neural networks and 3D structure-based complex graph.
    Dong L; Shi S; Qu X; Luo D; Wang B
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Sep; 25(35):24110-24120. PubMed ID: 37655493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Deep Learning Model for Efficient Protein-Ligand Docking with Implicit Side-Chain Flexibility.
    Masters MR; Mahmoud AH; Wei Y; Lill MA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Mar; 63(6):1695-1707. PubMed ID: 36916514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Energy-based graph convolutional networks for scoring protein docking models.
    Cao Y; Shen Y
    Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 32144844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. InteractionGraphNet: A Novel and Efficient Deep Graph Representation Learning Framework for Accurate Protein-Ligand Interaction Predictions.
    Jiang D; Hsieh CY; Wu Z; Kang Y; Wang J; Wang E; Liao B; Shen C; Xu L; Wu J; Cao D; Hou T
    J Med Chem; 2021 Dec; 64(24):18209-18232. PubMed ID: 34878785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CSAR Benchmark of Flexible MedusaDock in Affinity Prediction and Nativelike Binding Pose Selection.
    Nedumpully-Govindan P; Jemec DB; Ding F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1042-52. PubMed ID: 26252196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improved Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction with Structure-Based Deep Fusion Inference.
    Jones D; Kim H; Zhang X; Zemla A; Stevenson G; Bennett WFD; Kirshner D; Wong SE; Lightstone FC; Allen JE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Apr; 61(4):1583-1592. PubMed ID: 33754707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Predicting Drug-Target Interactions.
    Torng W; Altman RB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Oct; 59(10):4131-4149. PubMed ID: 31580672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. DeepBindBC: A practical deep learning method for identifying native-like protein-ligand complexes in virtual screening.
    Zhang H; Zhang T; Saravanan KM; Liao L; Wu H; Zhang H; Zhang H; Pan Y; Wu X; Wei Y
    Methods; 2022 Sep; 205():247-262. PubMed ID: 35878751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Emulating Docking Results Using a Deep Neural Network: A New Perspective for Virtual Screening.
    Jastrzębski S; Szymczak M; Pocha A; Mordalski S; Tabor J; Bojarski AJ; Podlewska S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4246-4262. PubMed ID: 32865414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
    Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and a traditional scoring function.
    Wang Z; Zheng L; Wang S; Lin M; Wang Z; Kong AW; Mu Y; Wei Y; Li W
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36502369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MILCDock: Machine Learning Enhanced Consensus Docking for Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Morris CJ; Stern JA; Stark B; Christopherson M; Della Corte D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5342-5350. PubMed ID: 36342217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.