BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38177786)

  • 41. Leveraging scaffold information to predict protein-ligand binding affinity with an empirical graph neural network.
    Xia C; Feng SH; Xia Y; Pan X; Shen HB
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36627113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Convolutional neural network scoring and minimization in the D3R 2017 community challenge.
    Sunseri J; King JE; Francoeur PG; Koes DR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 29992528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. From Proteins to Ligands: Decoding Deep Learning Methods for Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Gorantla R; Kubincová A; Weiße AY; Mey ASJS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2496-2507. PubMed ID: 37983381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Pose Classification Using Three-Dimensional Atomic Structure-Based Neural Networks Applied to Ion Channel-Ligand Docking.
    Shim H; Kim H; Allen JE; Wulff H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 May; 62(10):2301-2315. PubMed ID: 35447030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Visualizing convolutional neural network protein-ligand scoring.
    Hochuli J; Helbling A; Skaist T; Ragoza M; Koes DR
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Sep; 84():96-108. PubMed ID: 29940506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. GraphSite: Ligand Binding Site Classification with Deep Graph Learning.
    Shi W; Singha M; Pu L; Srivastava G; Ramanujam J; Brylinski M
    Biomolecules; 2022 Jul; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36008947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. AtomNet PoseRanker: Enriching Ligand Pose Quality for Dynamic Proteins in Virtual High-Throughput Screens.
    Stafford KA; Anderson BM; Sorenson J; van den Bedem H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Mar; 62(5):1178-1189. PubMed ID: 35235748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Combining Docking Pose Rank and Structure with Deep Learning Improves Protein-Ligand Binding Mode Prediction over a Baseline Docking Approach.
    Morrone JA; Weber JK; Huynh T; Luo H; Cornell WD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4170-4179. PubMed ID: 32077698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. HCovDock: an efficient docking method for modeling covalent protein-ligand interactions.
    Wu Q; Huang SY
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36573474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Correcting the impact of docking pose generation error on binding affinity prediction.
    Li H; Leung KS; Wong MH; Ballester PJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17(Suppl 11):308. PubMed ID: 28185549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Local Interaction Density (LID), a Fast and Efficient Tool to Prioritize Docking Poses.
    Jacquemard C; Tran-Nguyen VK; Drwal MN; Rognan D; Kellenberger E
    Molecules; 2019 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 31323745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. End-to-end learning for compound activity prediction based on binding pocket information.
    Tanebe T; Ishida T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct; 22(Suppl 3):529. PubMed ID: 34715777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Advances in Docking.
    Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
    Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Discrete molecular dynamics distinguishes nativelike binding poses from decoys in difficult targets.
    Proctor EA; Yin S; Tropsha A; Dokholyan NV
    Biophys J; 2012 Jan; 102(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 22225808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative Assessment of Pose Prediction Accuracy in RNA-Ligand Docking.
    Agarwal R; T RR; Smith JC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Dec; 63(23):7444-7452. PubMed ID: 37972310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.
    Hsieh JH; Yin S; Wang XS; Liu S; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 22017385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. SPOT-Ligand: Fast and effective structure-based virtual screening by binding homology search according to ligand and receptor similarity.
    Yang Y; Zhan J; Zhou Y
    J Comput Chem; 2016 Jul; 37(18):1734-9. PubMed ID: 27074979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. AGL-Score: Algebraic Graph Learning Score for Protein-Ligand Binding Scoring, Ranking, Docking, and Screening.
    Nguyen DD; Wei GW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jul; 59(7):3291-3304. PubMed ID: 31257871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Hybrid Docking and Machine Learning Approach to Enhance the Performance of Virtual Screening Carried out on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Singh N; Villoutreix BO
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.