These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38177786)

  • 61. A Hybrid Docking and Machine Learning Approach to Enhance the Performance of Virtual Screening Carried out on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Singh N; Villoutreix BO
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Stalis: A Computational Method for Template-Based Ab Initio Ligand Design.
    Lee HS; Im W
    J Comput Chem; 2019 Jun; 40(17):1622-1632. PubMed ID: 30829435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Post processing of protein-compound docking for fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD): in-silico structure-based drug screening and ligand-binding pose prediction.
    Fukunishi Y
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2010; 10(6):680-94. PubMed ID: 20337587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Novel Consensus Docking Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction.
    Ren X; Shi YS; Zhang Y; Liu B; Zhang LH; Peng YB; Zeng R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 30044626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Affinity prediction using deep learning based on SMILES input for D3R grand challenge 4.
    Lim S; Lee YO; Yoon J; Kim YJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Mar; 36(3):225-235. PubMed ID: 35314897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: Ligand interaction analysis and optimisation of virtual screening.
    Ghattas MA; Atatreh N; Bichenkova EV; Bryce RA
    J Mol Graph Model; 2014 Jul; 52():114-23. PubMed ID: 25038507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Pason LP; Sotriffer CA
    Mol Inform; 2016 Dec; 35(11-12):541-548. PubMed ID: 27870243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Regression-Based Active Learning for Accessible Acceleration of Ultra-Large Library Docking.
    Marin E; Kovaleva M; Kadukova M; Mustafin K; Khorn P; Rogachev A; Mishin A; Guskov A; Borshchevskiy V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2612-2623. PubMed ID: 38157481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.
    Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1441-1458. PubMed ID: 29890081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. DynamicBind: predicting ligand-specific protein-ligand complex structure with a deep equivariant generative model.
    Lu W; Zhang J; Huang W; Zhang Z; Jia X; Wang Z; Shi L; Li C; Wolynes PG; Zheng S
    Nat Commun; 2024 Feb; 15(1):1071. PubMed ID: 38316797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Cross-docking benchmark for automated pose and ranking prediction of ligand binding.
    Wierbowski SD; Wingert BM; Zheng J; Camacho CJ
    Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):298-305. PubMed ID: 31721338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. DiffBindFR: an SE(3) equivariant network for flexible protein-ligand docking.
    Zhu J; Gu Z; Pei J; Lai L
    Chem Sci; 2024 May; 15(21):7926-7942. PubMed ID: 38817560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Equivariant Scalar Fields for Molecular Docking with Fast Fourier Transforms.
    Jing B; Jaakkola T; Berger B
    ArXiv; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38106455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Water Network-Augmented Two-State Model for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction.
    Qu X; Dong L; Luo D; Si Y; Wang B
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Apr; 64(7):2263-2274. PubMed ID: 37433009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.
    Slynko I; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):669-683. PubMed ID: 27480696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.
    Arcon JP; Turjanski AG; Martí MA; Forli S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():39-72. PubMed ID: 33759120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. GalaxyDock BP2 score: a hybrid scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking.
    Baek M; Shin WH; Chung HW; Seok C
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jul; 31(7):653-666. PubMed ID: 28623486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.