127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38182499)
21. The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.
Hansen NL; Barrett T; Koo B; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Warren A; Kastner C; Bratt O
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):724-730. PubMed ID: 27488931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reducing the demand for magnetic resonance imaging scans and prostate biopsies during the early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: Applying the Barcelona risk-stratified pathway in Catalonia.
Morote J; Borque-Fernando Á; Esteban LE; Picola N; Muñoz-Rodriguez J; Paesano N; Ruiz-Plazas X; Muñoz-Rivero MV; Celma A; García-de Manuel G; Miró B; Abascal JM; Servian P
Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 42(4):115.e1-115.e7. PubMed ID: 38342654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series.
Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Sorce G; Barletta F; De Angelis M; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Prostate; 2022 Sep; 82(12):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 35538401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.
Barletta F; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scuderi S; Brembilla G; de Angelis M; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Karnes RJ; Roupret M; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2683-2688. PubMed ID: 36149448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do all patients with suspicious prostate cancer need Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging before prostate biopsy?
Teixeira Anacleto S; Neves Alberto J; Carvalho Dias E; Sousa Passos P; Cerqueira Alves M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Mar; 94(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 35352522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study.
Pham THN; Schulze-Hagen MF; Rahnama'i MS
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 Feb; 7(2):e1962. PubMed ID: 38217298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Limitations of overlapping cores in systematic and MRI-US fusion biopsy.
Lee AY; Yang XY; Lee HJ; Law YM; Huang HH; Sim AS; Lau WK; Lee LS; Cheng CW; Ho HS; Yuen JS; Tay KJ; Chen K
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):782.e15-782.e21. PubMed ID: 33888423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies.
Filson CP; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Huang J; Lieu P; Dorey FJ; Reiter RE; Marks LS
Cancer; 2016 Mar; 122(6):884-92. PubMed ID: 26749141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis.
Avolio PP; Lughezzani G; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Uleri A; Frego N; Hurle R; Lazzeri M; Saita A; Guazzoni G; Casale P; Buffi NM
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):832.e1-832.e7. PubMed ID: 34183255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The utility of in-bore multiparametric magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in men with negative multiparametric magnetic resonance-ultrasound software-based fusion targeted biopsy.
Perrin A; Venderink W; Patak MA; Möckel C; Fehr JL; Jichlinski P; Porcellini B; Lucca I; Futterer J; Valerio M
Urol Oncol; 2021 May; 39(5):297.e9-297.e16. PubMed ID: 33341358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.
Freifeld Y; Xi Y; Passoni N; Woldu S; Hornberger B; Goldberg K; Bagrodia A; Raj G; Margulis V; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I; G Roehrborn C; Costa DN
Urol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 37(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 30446460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. How Often Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detect Prostate Cancer Missed by Transrectal Ultrasound?
Herlemann A; Overland MR; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 32868222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Who Benefits from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Suspicion of Prostate Cancer?
Morote J; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semedey ME; Regis L; Planas J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):664-669. PubMed ID: 31411977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
