147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38182962)
21. The advantage of cone-beam computerized tomography over panoramic radiography and temporomandibular joint quadruple radiography in assessing temporomandibular joint osseous degenerative changes.
Tsai CM; Wu FY; Chai JW; Chen MH; Kao CT
J Dent Sci; 2020 Jun; 15(2):153-162. PubMed ID: 32595895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):79884780. PubMed ID: 22933535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: Effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and effective dose.
Librizzi ZT; Tadinada AS; Valiyaparambil JV; Lurie AG; Mallya SM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):e25-30. PubMed ID: 21724068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. As Low Dose as Sufficient Quality: Optimization of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scanning Protocol for Tooth Autotransplantation Planning and Follow-up in Children.
EzEldeen M; Stratis A; Coucke W; Codari M; Politis C; Jacobs R
J Endod; 2017 Feb; 43(2):210-217. PubMed ID: 28027823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Measurement accuracy of temporomandibular joint space in Promax 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Zhang ZL; Cheng JG; Li G; Zhang JZ; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jul; 114(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 22727100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgivisio® and O-arm®O2 cone beam CT mobile systems for guidance of lumbar spine surgery: Comparison of patient radiation dose.
Rousseau J; Dreuil S; Bassinet C; Cao S; Elleaume H
Phys Med; 2021 May; 85():192-199. PubMed ID: 34111631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comprehensive Monte Carlo study of patient doses from cone-beam CT imaging in radiotherapy.
Marchant TE; Joshi KD
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 27922831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In children and adolescents with temporomandibular disorder assembled with juvenile idiopathic arthritis - no association were found between pain and TMJ deformities using CBCT.
Fischer J; Augdal TA; Angenete O; Gil EG; Skeie MS; Åstrøm AN; Tylleskär K; Rosendahl K; Shi XQ; Rosén A;
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):518. PubMed ID: 34641860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimation of the effective dose of dental cone-beam computed tomography using personal computer-based Monte Carlo software.
Kim EK; Han WJ; Choi JW; Battulga B
Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Mar; 48(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 29581946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of a low-dose protocol for cone beam computed tomography of the temporomandibular joint.
Iskanderani D; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellen-Halme K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190495. PubMed ID: 32250642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry.
Lukat TD; Wong JC; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130082. PubMed ID: 24048693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations.
Kralik I; Faj D; Lauc T; Škarica M; Popić J; Brkic H
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 30264736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of cone beam CT (CBCT) scan parameters on size specific dose estimate (SSDE): a Monte Carlo study.
Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ; Demirkaya O
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(11):115002. PubMed ID: 30822764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Investigation of practical approaches to evaluating cumulative dose for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) from standard CT dosimetry measurements: a Monte Carlo study.
Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ; Sankaralingam M; Gentle DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(14):5413-38. PubMed ID: 26118740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose assessment in dental cone-beam computed tomography: Comparison of optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry with Monte Carlo method.
Lee C; Yoon J; Han SS; Na JY; Lee JH; Kim YH; Hwang JJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0219103. PubMed ID: 32231373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of coefficients to derive organ and effective doses from cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans: a Monte Carlo study.
Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 29154259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints.
Barghan S; Tetradis S; Mallya S
Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():109-18. PubMed ID: 22376103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
