BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38183059)

  • 1. Impact of orthodontic-induced facial morphology changes on aesthetic evaluation: a retrospective study.
    Liu C; Du S; Wang Z; Guo S; Cui M; Zhai Q; Zhang M; Fang B
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):24. PubMed ID: 38183059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthodontic program design based on aesthetic.
    Ma Y; Jin Z
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 41(6):628-634. PubMed ID: 38597026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in the facial soft-tissue profile after mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Rupperti S; Winterhalder P; Rudzki I; Mast G; Holberg C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 30173318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of extraction of four premolars on vermilion height and lip area in patients with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Trisnawaty N; Ioi H; Kitahara T; Suzuki A; Takahashi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 22573908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of functional orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness of children with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Paduano S; Rongo R; Bucci R; Carvelli G; Cioffi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):144-150. PubMed ID: 31586412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived Effects of Orthognathic Surgery versus Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment of Convex Facial Profile Patients.
    Psomiadis S; Gkantidis N; Sifakakis I; Iatrou I
    J Clin Med; 2023 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 38202096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement in facial aesthetics of orthognathic patients after surgery-first approach.
    AlOtaibi NM; Liu CH; Benington PCM; Ayoub AF
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 61(10):666-671. PubMed ID: 37863725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons.
    Souza DB; Oliveira AI; Gouvêa GR; Santamaria-Jr M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e2220519. PubMed ID: 36074432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria.
    Melo AR; Conti ACCF; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Didier V; Valarelli DP; Capelozza Filho L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017 Feb; 22(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 28444021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [In vitro study of a new lasso device for intra-canal broken instrument removal].
    Cai CL; Ye NS; Yuan LJ; Wu SC; Pan GY; Fang B
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Dec; 30(6):611-617. PubMed ID: 35587016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18263888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients.
    Zouloumi ME; Tsiouli K; Psomiadis S; Kolokitha OE; Topouzelis N; Gkantidis N
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Nov; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 31761963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of three-dimensional changes in lip vermilion in adult female patients after orthodontic extraction: a retrospective longitudinal study.
    Shen LH; Xie TY; Jiang RP; Jiang YR; Chen G; Xu TM; Han B
    Head Face Med; 2021 Mar; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 33741006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia.
    Carneiro EN; Pithon MM; Machado AW; Braga E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photographic Facial Soft Tissue Analysis by Means of Linear and Angular Measurements in an Adolescent Persian Population.
    Moshkelgosha V; Fathinejad S; Pakizeh Z; Shamsa M; Golkari A
    Open Dent J; 2015; 9():346-56. PubMed ID: 26464606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.
    Bravo LA
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8172393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of incisor retraction on facial aesthetics.
    Hodgkinson D; Firth FA; Farella M
    J Orthod; 2019 Jun; 46(1_suppl):49-53. PubMed ID: 31056032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of dental and facial aesthetics in adolescents.
    al Yami EA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Van 't Hof MA
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 9753821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.