148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38183462)
1. Comparison of substernal and posterior mediastinal route of reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Dat TQ; Thong DQ; Nguyen DT; Hai NV; Bac NH; Long VD
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Jan; 409(1):27. PubMed ID: 38183462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for evaluating blood supply in the gastric conduit via the substernal route after McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Nguyen DT; Dat TQ; Thong DQ; Hai NV; Bac NH; Long VD
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Apr; 28(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 38583883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of the route of reconstruction on post-operative morbidity and malnutrition after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study.
Yamasaki M; Miyata H; Yasuda T; Shiraishi O; Takahashi T; Motoori M; Yano M; Shiozaki H; Mori M; Doki Y
World J Surg; 2015 Feb; 39(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 25315089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Retrosternal Route Creation for the Gastric Conduit: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Posterior Mediastinal Reconstruction.
Horikawa M; Oshikiri T; Kato T; Sawada R; Harada H; Urakawa N; Goto H; Hasegawa H; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Kakeji Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4044-4053. PubMed ID: 37088861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Reconstruction Route on Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy: Analysis of Esophagectomies in the Japanese National Clinical Database.
Kikuchi H; Endo H; Yamamoto H; Ozawa S; Miyata H; Kakeji Y; Matsubara H; Doki Y; Kitagawa Y; Takeuchi H
Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2022 Jan; 6(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 35106414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified layered hand-sewn cervical end-to-side anastomosis for minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.
Cheng L; Fu S; Liu J; Wang Z; Fu M
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 124(7):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 34309871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A approach of gastric conduit via the anterior of pulmonary hilum route during minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.
Yan Z; Xu X; Guo B; Wang P; Niu L; Gao Z; Yuan Y; Li F; He M
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Apr; 19(1):232. PubMed ID: 38627783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Preventing anastomotic complications: early results of laparoscopic gastric devascularization two weeks prior to minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Strosberg DS; Merritt RE; Perry KA
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 27495339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the best reconstruction procedure after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis comparing posterior mediastinal and retrosternal approaches.
Booka E; Takeuchi H; Morita Y; Hiramatsu Y; Kikuchi H
Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2023 Jul; 7(4):553-564. PubMed ID: 37416735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Esophageal reconstruction: posterior mediastinal or retrosternal route.
Yang J; Xu C; Lian D; Ye S; Zeng Z; Liu D; Zhuang C
J Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 201(2):364-9. PubMed ID: 27020820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of QoL Between Substernal and Posterior Mediastinal Routes in Esophagogastrostomy.
Park SY; Jung I; Heo SJ; Byun GE; Lee EY; Kim DJ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Mar; 25(3):635-640. PubMed ID: 32779083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy.
Mao CY; Yang YS; Yuan Y; Hu WP; Zhao YF; Hu Y; Che GW; Chen LQ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 26(12):4062-4069. PubMed ID: 31313034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Substernal reconstruction following esophagectomy: operation of last resort?
Moremen JR; Ceppa DP; Rieger KM; Birdas TJ
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Dec; 9(12):5040-5045. PubMed ID: 29312708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.
Berlth F; Plum PS; Chon SH; Gutschow CA; Bollschweiler E; Hölscher AH
Surg Endosc; 2018 Dec; 32(12):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 29931451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Causes and prevention of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and reconstruction through different routes for esophageal cancer].
Fang WT; Chen WH; Fan LM; Cao KJ; Chen Y; Jiang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 8(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 16167231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management and outcomes of anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy: A retrospective analysis of 749 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer.
Duan X; Bai W; Ma Z; Yue J; Shang X; Jiang H; Yu Z
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():304-309. PubMed ID: 32891347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
