127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38184155)
1. Opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery: Is it a worthy choice?
Lu Y; Lindheim SR; Sun Y
Fertil Steril; 2024 Mar; 121(3):446-447. PubMed ID: 38184155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.
Naumann RW; Hughes BN; Brown J; Drury LK; Herzog TJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):397.e1-397.e6. PubMed ID: 33798477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.
Subramaniam A; Einerson BD; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 30477808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal].
São Pedro V; Pires R; Santos F; Tovim Rodrigues C; Santos Silva I; Almeida MC; Águas F
Acta Med Port; 2021 Mar; 34(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 34214417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technique for bilateral salpingectomy at the time of Cesarean delivery: a case series.
Duncan JR; Schenone MH; Mari G
Contraception; 2017 May; 95(5):509-511. PubMed ID: 28263747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; Finlayson SJ; Huntsman DG; Miller D; McAlpine JN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):172.e1-172.e8. PubMed ID: 29852159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Permanent Sterilization after Failed Attempt at Bilateral Tubal Ligation at the Time of Previous Cesarean Section.
Hui M; Schwartzenburg C; Bhalwal A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 35863610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation during cesarean delivery.
Du Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Nov; 298(5):1037-1038. PubMed ID: 30242497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial.
Ganer Herman H; Gluck O; Keidar R; Kerner R; Kovo M; Levran D; Bar J; Sagiv R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):472.e1-472.e6. PubMed ID: 28455082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications after opportunistic salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.
Rufin KGA; do Valle HA; McAlpine JN; Elwood C; Hanley GE
Fertil Steril; 2024 Mar; 121(3):531-539. PubMed ID: 38043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits and Risks of Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Delivery for Permanent Postpartum Contraception.
Luke S; Addae-Konadu K; Davidson B; Kuller J; Dotters-Katz S
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2022 Mar; 77(3):167-173. PubMed ID: 35275215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complete salpingectomy versus tubal ligation during cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang M; Du Y; Hu Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(22):3794-3802. PubMed ID: 31752570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risks and Benefits of Salpingectomy at the Time of Sterilization.
Castellano T; Zerden M; Marsh L; Boggess K
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2017 Nov; 72(11):663-668. PubMed ID: 29164264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):e279-e284. PubMed ID: 30913199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Garcia C; Moskowitz OM; Chisholm CA; Duska LR; Warren AL; Lyons GR; Pettit KE
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29889755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.
Shinar S; Blecher Y; Alpern S; Many A; Ashwal E; Amikam U; Cohen A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 28285425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
