These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38184207)
1. Sign-tracking and goal-tracking in humans: Utilising eye-tracking in clinical and non-clinical populations. Dinu LM; Georgescu AL; Singh SN; Byrom NC; Overton PG; Singer BF; Dommett EJ Behav Brain Res; 2024 Mar; 461():114846. PubMed ID: 38184207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mechanical task for measuring sign- and goal-tracking in humans: A proof-of-concept study. Cope LM; Gheidi A; Martz ME; Duval ER; Khalil H; Allerton T; Morrow JD Behav Brain Res; 2023 Jan; 436():114112. PubMed ID: 36115435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which cue to 'want'? Opioid stimulation of central amygdala makes goal-trackers show stronger goal-tracking, just as sign-trackers show stronger sign-tracking. DiFeliceantonio AG; Berridge KC Behav Brain Res; 2012 May; 230(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 22391118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of predictive and incentive value manipulation on sign- and goal-tracking behavior. María-Ríos CE; Fitzpatrick CJ; Czesak FN; Morrow JD Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2023 Sep; 203():107796. PubMed ID: 37385521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic Encoding of Incentive Salience in the Ventral Pallidum: Dependence on the Form of the Reward Cue. Ahrens AM; Ferguson LM; Robinson TE; Aldridge JW eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29740595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lesions of the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus differentially affect sign- and goal-tracking conditioned responses. Haight JL; Fraser KM; Akil H; Flagel SB Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2478-88. PubMed ID: 26228683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conditioned approach behavior of SHR and SD rats during Pavlovian conditioning. Silic B; Aggarwal M; Liyanagama K; Tripp G; Wickens JR Behav Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 443():114348. PubMed ID: 36796486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity. Gillis ZS; Morrison SE eNeuro; 2019; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 30886890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk-promoting effects of reward-paired cues in human sign- and goal-trackers. Cherkasova MV; Clark L; Barton JJS; Stoessl AJ; Winstanley CA Behav Brain Res; 2024 Mar; 461():114865. PubMed ID: 38220058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibition of Dopamine Neurons Prevents Incentive Value Encoding of a Reward Cue: With Revelations from Deep Phenotyping. Iglesias AG; Chiu AS; Wong J; Campus P; Li F; Liu ZN; Bhatti JK; Patel SA; Deisseroth K; Akil H; Burgess CR; Flagel SB J Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 43(44):7376-7392. PubMed ID: 37709540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The tendency to sign-track predicts cue-induced reinstatement during nicotine self-administration, and is enhanced by nicotine but not ethanol. Versaggi CL; King CP; Meyer PJ Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Aug; 233(15-16):2985-97. PubMed ID: 27282365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examining the role of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in Pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors. Fraser KM; Haight JL; Gardner EL; Flagel SB Behav Brain Res; 2016 May; 305():87-99. PubMed ID: 26909847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subanesthetic ketamine decreases the incentive-motivational value of reward-related cues. Fitzpatrick CJ; Morrow JD J Psychopharmacol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 27649773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sign- and goal-tracking rats show differences in various executive functions: Authors. Enkel T; Bartsch D; Bähner F Behav Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 371():111979. PubMed ID: 31141726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural Activity in the Ventral Pallidum Encodes Variation in the Incentive Value of a Reward Cue. Ahrens AM; Meyer PJ; Ferguson LM; Robinson TE; Aldridge JW J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 36(30):7957-70. PubMed ID: 27466340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dorsolateral neostriatum contribution to incentive salience: opioid or dopamine stimulation makes one reward cue more motivationally attractive than another. DiFeliceantonio AG; Berridge KC Eur J Neurosci; 2016 May; 43(9):1203-18. PubMed ID: 26924040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of corticosterone on the acquisition of Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior in rats is dependent on sex and vendor. Turfe A; Westbrook SR; Lopez SA; Chang SE; Flagel SB Horm Behav; 2024 Aug; 164():105609. PubMed ID: 39083878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental manipulations alter age differences in attribution of incentive salience to reward-paired cues. Anderson RI; Bush PC; Spear LP Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():83-9. PubMed ID: 24050888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats. King CP; Palmer AA; Woods LC; Hawk LW; Richards JB; Meyer PJ Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jul; 233(13):2593-605. PubMed ID: 27146401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]