194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38184595)
1. AI-driven decision support systems and epistemic reliance: a qualitative study on obstetricians' and midwives' perspectives on integrating AI-driven CTG into clinical decision making.
Dlugatch R; Georgieva A; Kerasidou A
BMC Med Ethics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):6. PubMed ID: 38184595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The social organisation of decision-making about intrapartum fetal monitoring: An Institutional Ethnography.
Small KA; Sidebotham M; Fenwick J; Gamble J
Women Birth; 2023 May; 36(3):281-289. PubMed ID: 36127282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care.
Dlugatch R; Georgieva A; Kerasidou A
BMC Med Ethics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):42. PubMed ID: 37340408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study.
Daemers DOA; van Limbeek EBM; Wijnen HAA; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28985725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Midwives' and obstetricians' practice, perspectives and experiences in relation to altered fetal movement: A focused ethnographic study.
Clark JA; Smith LK; Armstrong N
Int J Nurs Stud; 2024 Feb; 150():104643. PubMed ID: 38043485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for CS for first-time mothers-A qualitative descriptive study.
Panda S; Begley C; Daly D
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279403. PubMed ID: 36576912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "I don't think people are ready to trust these algorithms at face value": trust and the use of machine learning algorithms in the diagnosis of rare disease.
Hallowell N; Badger S; Sauerbrei A; Nellåker C; Kerasidou A
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):112. PubMed ID: 36384545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midwives' and Medical professionals' perspectives of collaborative practice at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Maternity Unit, Malawi: The discovery phase of an appreciative inquiry project.
Chodzaza E; Mbiza C; Gadama L; Kafulafula U
Malawi Med J; 2020 Mar; 32(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 32733654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing repeat caesarean section: qualitative exploratory study of obstetricians' and midwives' accounts.
Kamal P; Dixon-Woods M; Kurinczuk JJ; Oppenheimer C; Squire P; Waugh J
BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1054-60. PubMed ID: 16045517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Iranian midwives' lived experiences of providing continuous midwife-led intrapartum care: a qualitative study.
Amiri-Farahani L; Gharacheh M; Sadeghzadeh N; Peyravi H; Pezaro S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):724. PubMed ID: 36151533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes of midwives and obstetricians towards midwives practiced roles in hospitals: A national study in Jordan.
Kiewan R; Gharaibeh M; Alnuaimi K; Abuhammad S; Aladwan H
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Dec; 75(12):e14891. PubMed ID: 34541750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Midwives' and obstetricians' perspectives about pregnancy related weight management in Ethiopia: A qualitative study.
Asefa F; Cummins A; Dessie Y; Foureu M; Hayen A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244221. PubMed ID: 33332406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the future of artificial intelligence in obstetrics? A qualitative study among healthcare professionals.
Fischer A; Rietveld A; Teunissen P; Hoogendoorn M; Bakker P
BMJ Open; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e076017. PubMed ID: 37879682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.
Panda S; Begley C; Daly D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200941. PubMed ID: 30052666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The community-based bilingual doula - A new actor filling gaps in labour care for migrant women. Findings from a qualitative study of midwives' and obstetricians' experiences.
Schytt E; Wahlberg A; Small R; Eltayb A; Lindgren H
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2021 Jun; 28():100614. PubMed ID: 33813256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of Midwifery - Obstetrics Collaboration (MOC) scale: A tool to improve collaborative practice.
Onibokun OO; Morelli EM; Illuzzi JL; White MA
Midwifery; 2021 May; 96():102941. PubMed ID: 33618318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to Foster Effective Midwife-Obstetrician Collaboration on Labor and Birth Units: Qualitative Analysis of Experiences of Clinicians in the United States.
Adeyemo OO; Morelli EE; Kennedy HP
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 Sep; 67(5):552-560. PubMed ID: 35754313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of obstetricians' decision making on CTG recordings.
Spilka J; Chudáček V; Janků P; Hruban L; Burša M; Huptych M; Zach L; Lhotská L
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Oct; 51():72-9. PubMed ID: 24747355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practice, skills and experience with the Pinard stethoscope for intrapartum Foetal monitoring: Focus group interviews with Norwegian midwives.
Engelhart CH; Nilsen ABV; Pay ASD; Maude R; Kaasen A; Blix E
Midwifery; 2022 May; 108():103288. PubMed ID: 35240433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's, midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of a structured process to document refusal of recommended maternity care.
Jenkinson B; Kruske S; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Reynolds M; Kildea S
Women Birth; 2016 Dec; 29(6):531-541. PubMed ID: 27289330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
