These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38185185)

  • 1. Quality of YouTube Videos Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Is Unsatisfactory.
    D'Ambrosi R; Milinkovic DD; Abermann E; Herbort M; Fink C
    Arthroscopy; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38185185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions.
    D'Ambrosi R; Annibaldi A; Carrozzo A; Vieira TD; An JS; Freychet B; Sonnery-Cottet B
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2024 Jan; 12(1):23259671231219815. PubMed ID: 38188623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of Material Related to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament on TikTok.
    D'Ambrosi R; Hewett TE
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2024 Feb; 12(2):23259671241228543. PubMed ID: 38405012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online Videos Provide Poor Information Quality, Reliability, and Accuracy Regarding Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Springer B; Bechler U; Koller U; Windhager R; Waldstein W
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3037-3047. PubMed ID: 32679296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis.
    Kunze KN; Cohn MR; Wakefield C; Hamati F; LaPrade RF; Forsythe B; Yanke AB; Chahla J
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 1(2):e109-e114. PubMed ID: 32266347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Quality of YouTube Videos on Adhesive Capsulitis.
    Tang K; Azhar U; Babar M; Ahmed A; Oh A; Day W; Harb H; Chan FJ
    Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27406. PubMed ID: 36046306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the information about lateral epicondylitis on the YouTube platform reliable and of good quality?
    Özcan F; Gürçay E
    Phys Sportsmed; 2023 Oct; 51(5):458-462. PubMed ID: 36154542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.
    Seyyar SA; Mete A; Tıskaoğlu NS
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Sep; 45(7):748-755. PubMed ID: 35701305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.
    Kunze KN; Krivicich LM; Verma NN; Chahla J
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):233-238. PubMed ID: 31864582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. YouTube Is a Poor-Quality Source for Patient Information Regarding Patellar Dislocations.
    Abed V; Sullivan BM; Skinner M; Hawk GS; Khalily C; Conley C; Stone AV
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2023 Apr; 5(2):e459-e464. PubMed ID: 37101882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation.
    Abed V; Ray M; Smathers J; Stone AV
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36299. PubMed ID: 37077591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concerns of Quality and Reliability of Educational Videos Focused on Frailty Syndrome on YouTube Platform.
    Hawryluk NM; Stompór M; Joniec EZ
    Geriatrics (Basel); 2021 Dec; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 35076501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.
    Toksoz A; Duran MB
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Dec; 17(6):858.e1-858.e6. PubMed ID: 34756784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.
    Zhang X; Yang Y; Shen YW; Zhang KR; Ma LT; Ding C; Wang BY; Meng Y; Liu H
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():972348. PubMed ID: 36211682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality.
    McMahon KM; Schwartz J; Nilles-Melchert T; Ray K; Eaton V; Chakkalakal D
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e23984. PubMed ID: 35573564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.
    Askin A; Sengul L; Tosun A
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Dec; 29(12):105309. PubMed ID: 32992187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the quality of information on treatment of keratoconus on YouTube.
    Çetinkaya Yaprak A; Erkan Pota Ç
    Int Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 42(5):1499-1505. PubMed ID: 34845598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube.
    Karataş ME; Karataş G
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(2):754-759. PubMed ID: 34331096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos addressing eyelid ptosis surgery.
    Garip R; Sakallioğlu AK
    Orbit; 2022 Oct; 41(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 34713759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the lid loading videos on YouTube.
    Balci AS; Cabuk KŞ; Topcu H; Efe AC; Ulas MG
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Jun; 43(6):2065-2072. PubMed ID: 36484952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.