186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38185250)
1. Tissue Contamination Challenges the Credibility of Machine Learning Models in Real World Digital Pathology.
Irmakci I; Nateghi R; Zhou R; Vescovo M; Saft M; Ross AE; Yang XJ; Cooper LAD; Goldstein JA
Mod Pathol; 2024 Mar; 37(3):100422. PubMed ID: 38185250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology.
Irmakci I; Nateghi R; Zhou R; Ross AE; Yang XJ; Cooper LAD; Goldstein JA
medRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37205404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Machine learning classification of placental villous infarction, perivillous fibrin deposition, and intervillous thrombus.
Goldstein JA; Nateghi R; Irmakci I; Cooper LAD
Placenta; 2023 Apr; 135():43-50. PubMed ID: 36958179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bridging the gap between prostate radiology and pathology through machine learning.
Bhattacharya I; Lim DS; Aung HL; Liu X; Seetharaman A; Kunder CA; Shao W; Soerensen SJC; Fan RE; Ghanouni P; To'o KJ; Brooks JD; Sonn GA; Rusu M
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5160-5181. PubMed ID: 35633505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.
da Silva LM; Pereira EM; Salles PG; Godrich R; Ceballos R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Viret J; Chandarlapaty S; Ferreira CG; Ferrari B; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Reuter V; Dogdas B; DeMuth G; Sue J; Kanan C; Grady L; Fuchs TJ; Reis-Filho JS
J Pathol; 2021 Jun; 254(2):147-158. PubMed ID: 33904171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GestAltNet: aggregation and attention to improve deep learning of gestational age from placental whole-slide images.
Mobadersany P; Cooper LAD; Goldstein JA
Lab Invest; 2021 Jul; 101(7):942-951. PubMed ID: 33674784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An independent assessment of an artificial intelligence system for prostate cancer detection shows strong diagnostic accuracy.
Perincheri S; Levi AW; Celli R; Gershkovich P; Rimm D; Morrow JS; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Klimstra D; Sinard J
Mod Pathol; 2021 Aug; 34(8):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 33782551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.
Raciti P; Sue J; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Kapur S; Reuter V; Grady L; Kanan C; Klimstra DS; Fuchs TJ
Mod Pathol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):2058-2066. PubMed ID: 32393768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic uncertainty expressed in prostate needle biopsies. A College of American Pathologists Q-probes Study of 15,753 prostate needle biopsies in 332 institutions.
Novis DA; Zarbo RJ; Valenstein PA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Aug; 123(8):687-92. PubMed ID: 10420224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic effect of complete histologic sampling of prostate needle biopsy specimens.
Reyes AO; Humphrey PA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Apr; 109(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 9535395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Machine Learning to Detect Cytomegalovirus in Digital Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Slides.
Post CS; Cheng J; Pantanowitz L; Westerhoff M
Lab Invest; 2023 Oct; 103(10):100225. PubMed ID: 37527779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Biopsies Using Machine Learning.
Paulson N; Zeevi T; Papademetris M; Leapman MS; Onofrey JA; Sprenkle PC; Humphrey PA; Staib LH; Levi AW
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2022 Sep; 6():e2200016. PubMed ID: 36179281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Hybrid Human-Machine Learning Approach for Screening Prostate Biopsies Can Improve Clinical Efficiency Without Compromising Diagnostic Accuracy.
Dov D; Assaad S; Syedibrahim A; Bell J; Huang J; Madden J; Bentley R; McCall S; Henao R; Carin L; Foo WC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jun; 146(6):727-734. PubMed ID: 34591085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated detection of microscopic placental features indicative of maternal vascular malperfusion using machine learning.
Patnaik P; Khodaee A; Vasam G; Mukherjee A; Salsabili S; Ukwatta E; Grynspan D; Chan ADC; Bainbridge S
Placenta; 2024 Jan; 145():19-26. PubMed ID: 38011757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
