These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38185812)

  • 1. Enhancing recall in automated record screening: A resampling algorithm.
    Hou Z; Tipton E
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):372-383. PubMed ID: 38185812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the impact of screening automation on meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Norman CR; Leeflang MMG; Porcher R; Névéol A
    Syst Rev; 2019 Oct; 8(1):243. PubMed ID: 31661028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SWIFT-Review: a text-mining workbench for systematic review.
    Howard BE; Phillips J; Miller K; Tandon A; Mav D; Shah MR; Holmgren S; Pelch KE; Walker V; Rooney AA; Macleod M; Shah RR; Thayer K
    Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():87. PubMed ID: 27216467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of DistillerSR's machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening - impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes.
    Hamel C; Kelly SE; Thavorn K; Rice DB; Wells GA; Hutton B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):256. PubMed ID: 33059590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the Average Time to Discover relevant records.
    Ferdinands G; Schram R; de Bruin J; Bagheri A; Oberski DL; Tummers L; Teijema JJ; van de Schoot R
    Syst Rev; 2023 Jun; 12(1):100. PubMed ID: 37340494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer.
    Tsou AY; Treadwell JR; Erinoff E; Schoelles K
    Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 9(1):73. PubMed ID: 32241297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.
    Bannach-Brown A; Przybyła P; Thomas J; Rice ASC; Ananiadou S; Liao J; Macleod MR
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):23. PubMed ID: 30646959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of vocabularies, representations and ranking algorithms for gene prioritization by text mining.
    Yu S; Van Vooren S; Tranchevent LC; De Moor B; Moreau Y
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i119-25. PubMed ID: 18689812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for in vitro systematic reviews: a comparison of screening methods and training of a machine learning classifier.
    Wilson E; Cruz F; Maclean D; Ghanawi J; McCann SK; Brennan PM; Liao J; Sena ES; Macleod M
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2023 Jan; 137(2):181-193. PubMed ID: 36630537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
    Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews.
    Thomas J; McDonald S; Noel-Storr A; Shemilt I; Elliott J; Mavergames C; Marshall IJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():140-151. PubMed ID: 33171275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discriminating between empirical studies and nonempirical works using automated text classification.
    Langlois A; Nie JY; Thomas J; Hong QN; Pluye P
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Dec; 9(4):587-601. PubMed ID: 30103261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews.
    Rathbone J; Albarqouni L; Bakhit M; Beller E; Byambasuren O; Hoffmann T; Scott AM; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective study selection using text mining or a single-screening approach: a study protocol.
    Waffenschmidt S; Hausner E; Sieben W; Jaschinski T; Knelangen M; Overesch I
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):166. PubMed ID: 30340633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews.
    Wallace BC; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Brodley C; Schmid CH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():55. PubMed ID: 20102628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aligning text mining and machine learning algorithms with best practices for study selection in systematic literature reviews.
    Popoff E; Besada M; Jansen JP; Cope S; Kanters S
    Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 9(1):293. PubMed ID: 33308292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automation of literature screening using machine learning in medical evidence synthesis: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review protocol.
    Zhang Y; Liang S; Feng Y; Wang Q; Sun F; Chen S; Yang Y; He X; Zhu H; Pan H
    Syst Rev; 2022 Jan; 11(1):11. PubMed ID: 35031074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
    Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates.
    Surian D; Dunn AG; Orenstein L; Bashir R; Coiera E; Bourgeois FT
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Mar; 79():32-40. PubMed ID: 29410356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.