These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of image quality and radiation exposure from C-arm fluoroscopes when used for imaging the spine. Prasarn ML; Coyne E; Schreck M; Rodgers JD; Rechtine GR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(16):1401-4. PubMed ID: 23574814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurements of occupational and patient exposure as well as image quality for two C-arms. Blaickner M; Neuwirth J Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 23509391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the choice of mobile C-arms lead to a reduction of the intraoperative radiation dose? Richter PH; Steinbrener J; Schicho A; Gebhard F Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1608-12. PubMed ID: 27297706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SU-E-I-29: Dose Rate and Image Quality Comparison Between Philips Veradius and GE OEC 9900 Elite Fluoroscopic C-Arms. Springer A; Solem E; Kobistek R Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part4):3631. PubMed ID: 28519531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Radiation Using OEC 9900 Elite C-arm: Risk and Method for Decreasing Exposure. Keenen TL; Demirel S; Gheen A; Casabarro B; Fleishman D Health Phys; 2023 May; 124(5):380-390. PubMed ID: 36880954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flat Panel Detector c-Arms Are Associated with Dramatically Reduced Radiation Exposure During Ureteroscopy and Produce Superior Images. Lee JJ; Venna AM; McCarthy I; Cilento BG; Demers MG; MacDougall RD; Beaulieu D; Nosrati R; Nelson CP; Kurtz MP J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):789-794. PubMed ID: 33528298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of radiation dose to patient and staff for two interventional cardiology units: a phantom study. Mesbahi A; Mehnati P; Keshtkar A; Aslanabadi N Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(3):399-403. PubMed ID: 18621917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation exposure of a mobile 3D C-arm with large flat-panel detector for intraoperative imaging and navigation - an experimental study using an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom. Naseri Y; Hubbe U; Scholz C; Brönner J; Krüger MT; Klingler JH BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Aug; 20(1):96. PubMed ID: 32799805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children. Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance. Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions. Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector. Geijer H Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study. Geijer H; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography automatic exposure control techniques in 18F-FDG oncology PET-CT scanning. Iball GR; Tout D Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Apr; 35(4):372-81. PubMed ID: 24445670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Placement of iliosacral screws using 3D image-guided (O-Arm) technology and Stealth Navigation: comparison with traditional fluoroscopy. Theologis AA; Burch S; Pekmezci M Bone Joint J; 2016 May; 98-B(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 27143744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths. Escott BG; Ravi B; Weathermon AC; Acharya J; Gordon CL; Babyn PS; Kelley SP; Narayanan UG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Dec; 95(23):e1831-7. PubMed ID: 24306706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]