123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38186091)
1. [Short-term observation of electrical acoustic stimulation in patients with low frequency residual hearing after cochlear implant].
Wang RJ; Luo JF; Chao XH; Hu FX; Fan ZM; Xu L; Wang HB
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Dec; 58(12):1173-1182. PubMed ID: 38186091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients.
Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Outcomes in Children.
Park LR; Teagle HFB; Gagnon E; Woodard J; Brown KD
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 30252685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.
Tejani VD; Brown CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3667. PubMed ID: 32486815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users.
Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
