These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38186268)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuing bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone after first progression of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Li Y; Hu M; Zhang Z; Chu M; Xu R; Liu L; Dong W; Yang M; Zhang R
    Cancer Med; 2024 Jan; 13(1):e6904. PubMed ID: 38186268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.
    Zhang PF; Wen F; Zhou J; Huang JX; Zhou KX; Wu QJ; Wang XY; Zhang MX; Liao WT; Li Q
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jan; 22(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 31062173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
    Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305 in EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC patients who progressed on EGFR TKI therapy: A China-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Peng J; Xu H; Liu Q
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(10):e0312133. PubMed ID: 39423210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences of Chemotherapies and Targeted Biologics for Elderly Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
    Parikh RC; Du XL; Robert MO; Lairson DR
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 28025930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Su D; Wu B; Shi L
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L
    Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
    Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
    J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost‑effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Zhang L; Su H; Liang X; Chen X; Li Y
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):17734. PubMed ID: 39085374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy in the maintenance of patients with homologous recombination deficiency-positive advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
    Cedillo S; Garí C; Aceituno S; Manso L; Cercos Lleti AC; Ventayol Bosch P; Casado A; Perez Fidalgo A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 Feb; 34(2):277-284. PubMed ID: 38054270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Global Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Chan KKW; Virik K; Hammerman A; Brenner B; Flowers CR; Hall PS
    Oncologist; 2017 Jun; 22(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 28592621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective first-line use of biologics for unresectable
    Wong WWL; Zargar M; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Riesco-Martínez M; Chan KKW
    Curr Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(5):e597-e609. PubMed ID: 31708653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus nivolumab as first-line treatment for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Li Y; Liang X; Li H; Chen X
    Cancer; 2022 Nov; 128(22):3995-4003. PubMed ID: 36111952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
    Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.