169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38186268)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuing bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone after first progression of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Li Y; Hu M; Zhang Z; Chu M; Xu R; Liu L; Dong W; Yang M; Zhang R
Cancer Med; 2024 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 38186268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.
Zhang PF; Wen F; Zhou J; Huang JX; Zhou KX; Wu QJ; Wang XY; Zhang MX; Liao WT; Li Q
Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jan; 22(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 31062173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhou T; Wang X; Cao Y; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Nov; 22(1):1367. PubMed ID: 36397064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Liu L; Wang L; Chen L; Ding Y; Zhang Q; Shu Y
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1092385. PubMed ID: 36756110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line serplulimab combined with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1156427. PubMed ID: 37727602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus nivolumab as first-line treatment for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Li H; Chen X
Cancer; 2022 Nov; 128(22):3995-4003. PubMed ID: 36111952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L
Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Su D; Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Second-Line Chemotherapy Agents for Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Lam SW; Wai M; Lau JE; McNamara M; Earl M; Udeh B
Pharmacotherapy; 2017 Jan; 37(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 27870079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Liu X; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1054405. PubMed ID: 36923040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Zhang M; Xu K; Lin Y; Zhou C; Bao Y; Zhang L; Li X
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1169752. PubMed ID: 37313403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences of Chemotherapies and Targeted Biologics for Elderly Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Parikh RC; Du XL; Robert MO; Lairson DR
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 28025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Liu H; Wang Y; He Q
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Dec; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 36581793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
Gong H; Ong SC; Li F; Weng Z; Zhao K; Jiang Z
Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Mar; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 37004046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Li Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1113374. PubMed ID: 37182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy in the maintenance of patients with homologous recombination deficiency-positive advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Cedillo S; Garí C; Aceituno S; Manso L; Cercos Lleti AC; Ventayol Bosch P; Casado A; Perez Fidalgo A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38054270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
