126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38186377)
1. The accuracy and reliability of different midsagittal planes in the symmetry assessment using cone-beam computed tomography.
Yu S; Zheng Y; Dong L; Huang W; Wu H; Zhang Q; Yan X; Wu W; Lv T; Yuan X
Clin Anat; 2024 Mar; 37(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 38186377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.
Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition.
Green MN; Bloom JM; Kulbersh R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28863916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Construction and validity of a midsagittal plane based on the symmetry of a 3-dimensional model of the relevant cranial base.
Feng B; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Yu M; Wang H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):e49-e58. PubMed ID: 33357762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study.
Zheng X; Wang L; Zhang B; Bai X; Qin K; Tian Y; Zhao R; Liu S; Wang J; Zhao Z
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):600-606. PubMed ID: 29980353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Using three-dimensional craniofacial images to construct horizontal reference plane].
Kim MJ; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Oct; 51(5):937-943. PubMed ID: 31624402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative validity and reproducibility study of various landmark-oriented reference planes in 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis for patients receiving orthognathic surgery.
Lin HH; Chuang YF; Weng JL; Lo LJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117604. PubMed ID: 25668209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using the anterior cranial base to provide a reliable reference plane for patients with or without facial asymmetry.
Feng B; Yu X; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Wu F; Yu M; Chen Q
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e230-e245. PubMed ID: 36055884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical shape analysis-based determination of optimal midsagittal reference plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry.
Shin SM; Kim YM; Kim NR; Choi YS; Park SB; Kim YI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 27476357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated localization of mandibular landmarks in the construction of mandibular median sagittal plane.
Wang Y; Wu W; Christelle M; Sun M; Wen Z; Lin Y; Zhang H; Xu J
Eur J Med Res; 2024 Jan; 29(1):84. PubMed ID: 38287445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of cephalometric landmark identification on three-dimensional computed tomographic images.
Kim JH; An S; Hwang DM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 60(3):320-325. PubMed ID: 34690019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preliminary Study to Determine the Reference Plane of Patients With a Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
Kim NR; Park SB; Shin SM; Choi YS; Kim SS; Son WS; Kim YI
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Nov; 54(6):707-714. PubMed ID: 27537492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.
Park JU; Kook YA; Kim Y
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 22356706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
