These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38186377)

  • 21. 3D landmarks of Craniofacial Imaging and subsequent considerations on superimpositions in orthodontics-The Aarhus perspective.
    Cattaneo PM; Yung AKC; Holm A; Mashaly OM; Cornelis MA
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1():21-29. PubMed ID: 31074143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis.
    Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
    Sanders DA; Chandhoke TK; Uribe FA; Rigali PH; Nanda R
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 24935152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.
    Sam A; Currie K; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravére-Vich M
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 30423256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
    Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproducibility of three-dimensional coordinate systems based on craniofacial landmarks: a tentative evaluation of four systems created on images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography with a large field of view.
    Shibata M; Nawa H; Kise Y; Fuyamada M; Yoshida K; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):776-84. PubMed ID: 22348241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of an anatomical mid-sagittal plane for 3-dimensional cephalometry: A preliminary study.
    Vernucci RA; Aghazada H; Gardini K; Fegatelli DA; Barbato E; Galluccio G; Silvestri A
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Jun; 49(2):159-169. PubMed ID: 31281793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography.
    DeCesare A; Secanell M; Lagravère MO; Carey J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20130035. PubMed ID: 23640988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automatic Dent-landmark detection in 3-D CBCT dental volumes.
    Cheng E; Chen J; Yang J; Deng H; Wu Y; Megalooikonomou V; Gable B; Ling H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6204-7. PubMed ID: 22255756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in positions of cone-beam computed tomography landmarks in patients with skeletal Class III facial asymmetry according to midsagittal planes.
    Noh HK; Kim HJ; Park HS
    Korean J Orthod; 2023 Jul; 53(4):219-231. PubMed ID: 37322899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
    Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of three methods for constructing craniofacial mid-sagittal plane based on the cone beam computed tomography].
    Wang SW; Li M; Yang HF; Zhao YJ; Wang Y; Liu Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Apr; 48(2):330-5. PubMed ID: 27080291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
    Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions.
    Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Challenges in measuring angles between craniofacial structures.
    Yatabe M; Gomes L; Ruellas AC; Lopinto J; Macron L; Paniagua B; Budin F; Prieto JC; Ioshida M; Cevidanes L
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 27():e20180380. PubMed ID: 31166412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks.
    Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Kerbrat A; Rouch P; Gajny L; Schouman T
    J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(22):. PubMed ID: 34830583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
    Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.