These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38186922)

  • 1. On the bias in the AUC variance estimate.
    Xu J
    Pattern Recognit Lett; 2024 Feb; 178():62-68. PubMed ID: 38186922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing multi-class classifier performance by multi-class ROC analysis: A nonparametric approach.
    Xu J
    Neurocomputing (Amst); 2024 May; 583():. PubMed ID: 38645687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An efficient variance estimator of AUC and its applications to binary classification.
    Wang Q; Guo A
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4281-4300. PubMed ID: 32914457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.
    He H; Lyness JM; McDermott MP
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 18680124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel estimator for the two-way partial AUC.
    Chaibub Neto E; Yadav V; Sieberts SK; Omberg L
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Feb; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38378636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):528-541. PubMed ID: 25228637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Easy and accurate variance estimation of the nonparametric estimator of the partial area under the ROC curve and its application.
    Yu J; Yang L; Vexler A; Hutson AD
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(13):2251-82. PubMed ID: 26790540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of ROC curve with complex survey data.
    Yao W; Li Z; Graubard BI
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1293-303. PubMed ID: 25546290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence intervals for the Mann-Whitney test.
    Perme MP; Manevski D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3755-3768. PubMed ID: 30514179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Wu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):3937-3946. PubMed ID: 32725910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.
    Gallas BD
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16488848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias.
    Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):715-739. PubMed ID: 29338546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal two-phase sampling for comparing correlated areas under the ROC curves of two screening tests in the presence of verification bias.
    Wu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jun; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 38867658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with verification biased data.
    Hai Y; Qin G
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(30):4789-4820. PubMed ID: 32944975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models.
    Demler OV; Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2577-87. PubMed ID: 22415937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals for the length of the receiver-operating characteristic curve based on a smooth estimator.
    Martínez-Camblor P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 May; 32(5):978-993. PubMed ID: 36919382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating and comparing biomarkers with respect to the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve in two-phase case-control studies.
    Huang Y
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jul; 17(3):499-522. PubMed ID: 26883772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.