151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38187110)
1. Potential Usefulness a Coronal View using an Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Detecting Breast Lesions.
Suzuki M; Nakayama R; Namba K; Kawami H; Nara M; Nakamura S
Eur J Breast Health; 2024 Jan; 20(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 38187110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of coronal view in comparison with transverse view of three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound.
Suzuki M; Nakayama R; Namba K; Kawami H; Nara M; Smathers RL; Nakamura S
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 32249597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of lesion detection in the transverse and coronal views on automated breast sonography.
Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 25542948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Diagnostic Performance Using the Transverse Plane Plus Coronal Plane Compared With the Transverse Plane Alone in Screening Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Wang Y; Yue J; Xing Y; Ju Y; Gao X; Shu R; Wang Z; Liu B; Xiao Y; Zhang G; Li H; Wang T; Guan X; Song Z; Song H
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Jun; 43(6):1013-1024. PubMed ID: 38323467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re-evaluation of high-risk breast mammography lesions by target ultrasound and ABUS of breast non-mass-like lesions.
Zhang J; Cai L; Chen L; Pang X; Chen M; Yan D; Liu J; Luo L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Oct; 21(1):156. PubMed ID: 34702200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: Technical aspects and first results.
Vourtsis A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):579-592. PubMed ID: 30962169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interreader scoring variability in an observer study using dual-modality imaging for breast cancer detection in women with dense breasts.
Drukker K; Horsch KJ; Pesce LL; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):847-53. PubMed ID: 23601952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation Time Using a Concurrent-Read Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breast Tissue.
Jiang Y; Inciardi MF; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):452-461. PubMed ID: 29792747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of coronal view as a stand-alone assessment in women undergoing automated breast ultrasound.
Schiaffino S; Gristina L; Tosto S; Massone E; De Giorgis S; Garlaschi A; Tagliafico A; Calabrese M
Radiol Med; 2021 Feb; 126(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 32676876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates.
Gatta G; Cappabianca S; La Forgia D; Massafra R; Fanizzi A; Cuccurullo V; Brunese L; Tagliafico A; Grassi R
J Pers Med; 2021 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34575652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D Automated Breast Ultrasound System: Comparison of Interpretation Time of Senior Versus Junior Radiologist.
Arslan A; Ertaş G; Arıbal E
Eur J Breast Health; 2019 Jul; 15(3):153-157. PubMed ID: 31312790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
