122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38190018)
1. Measures of Agreement with Multiple Raters: Fréchet Variances and Inference.
Moss J
Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):517-541. PubMed ID: 38190018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hubert's multi-rater kappa revisited.
Martín Andrés A; Álvarez Hernández M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 31056757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of Cohen's Kappa and Gwet's AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples.
Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; Wedding D; Gwet KL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Apr; 13():61. PubMed ID: 23627889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulating and estimating agreement in the presence of multiple raters and covariates.
McKenzie KA; Mahnken JD
Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(11):1687-1698. PubMed ID: 36872574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Homogeneity score test of AC
Honda C; Ohyama T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 32020851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters.
Doktor K; Jensen TS; Christensen HW; Fredberg U; Kindt M; Boyle E; Hartvigsen J
Chiropr Man Therap; 2020 Feb; 28(1):8. PubMed ID: 32041626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing the Difference of Correlated Agreement Coefficients for Statistical Significance.
Gwet KL
Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):609-637. PubMed ID: 29795880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pitfalls in the use of kappa when interpreting agreement between multiple raters in reliability studies.
O'Leary S; Lund M; Ytre-Hauge TJ; Holm SR; Naess K; Dalland LN; McPhail SM
Physiotherapy; 2014 Mar; 100(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24262334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overall indices for assessing agreement among multiple raters.
Jang JH; Manatunga AK; Taylor AT; Long Q
Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4200-4215. PubMed ID: 30062738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Weighting schemes and incomplete data: A generalized Bayesian framework for chance-corrected interrater agreement.
van Oest R; Girard JM
Psychol Methods; 2022 Dec; 27(6):1069-1088. PubMed ID: 34766799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gwet's AC1 is not a substitute for Cohen's kappa - A comparison of basic properties.
Vach W; Gerke O
MethodsX; 2023; 10():102212. PubMed ID: 37234937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview.
Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Hendry A; Potter J; Bone I; Muir KW
Stroke; 2005 Apr; 36(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 15718510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate?
Zapf A; Castell S; Morawietz L; Karch A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():93. PubMed ID: 27495131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interrater reliability estimators tested against true interrater reliabilities.
Zhao X; Feng GC; Ao SH; Liu PL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):232. PubMed ID: 36038846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.
Gwet KL
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chance-corrected measures of reliability and validity in K x K tables.
Andrés AM; Marzo PF
Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Oct; 14(5):473-92. PubMed ID: 16248349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring Agreement Using Guessing Models and Knowledge Coefficients.
Moss J
Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):1002-1025. PubMed ID: 37291419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.
McHugh ML
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2012; 22(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 23092060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial testing of an electronic application of the simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (e-smRSq).
Dutta D; Foy C; Ramadurai G; Obaid M; Bruno A
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Sep; 29(9):105024. PubMed ID: 32807439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
