These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38190355)

  • 1. Finding the right power balance: Better study design and collaboration can reduce dependence on statistical power.
    Nakagawa S; Lagisz M; Yang Y; Drobniak SM
    PLoS Biol; 2024 Jan; 22(1):e3002423. PubMed ID: 38190355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
    Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
    J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low statistical power and overestimated anthropogenic impacts, exacerbated by publication bias, dominate field studies in global change biology.
    Yang Y; Hillebrand H; Lagisz M; Cleasby I; Nakagawa S
    Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Feb; 28(3):969-989. PubMed ID: 34736291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why prudence is needed when interpreting articles reporting clinical trial results in mental health.
    Dal-Ré R; Bobes J; Cuijpers P
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 28351418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty.
    Anderson SF; Kelley K; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1547-1562. PubMed ID: 28902575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
    Schimmack U
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):551-66. PubMed ID: 22924598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power to the People: Power, Negative Results and Sample Size.
    Gaskill BN; Garner JP
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 59(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 31852563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pooling resources to enhance rigour in psychophysiological research: Insights from open science approaches to meta-analysis.
    Saunders B; Inzlicht M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2021 Apr; 162():112-120. PubMed ID: 33529643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing unemployment benefit duration to increase job finding rates: a systematic review.
    Filges T; Jonassen AB; Jørgensen AK
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-194. PubMed ID: 37131392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: A review.
    Page MJ; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT; Egger M
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 33166064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Best (but oft forgotten) practices: sample size planning for powerful studies.
    Anderson SF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2019 Aug; 110(2):280-295. PubMed ID: 31131390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical significance and publication reporting bias in abstracts of reproductive medicine studies.
    Feng Q; Mol BW; Ioannidis JPA; Li W
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 39(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 38015794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The methodology for developing a prospective meta-analysis in the family planning community.
    Turok DK; Espey E; Edelman AB; Lotke PS; Lathrop EH; Teal SB; Jacobson JC; Simonsen SE; Schulz KF
    Trials; 2011 Apr; 12():104. PubMed ID: 21527040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finding the power to reduce publication bias.
    Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JP
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(10):1580-1598. PubMed ID: 28127782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.