These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38190931)
1. Prognostic performance of the IABP-SHOCK II Risk Score among cardiogenic shock subtypes in the critical care cardiology trials network registry. Alviar CL; Li BK; Keller NM; Bohula-May E; Barnett C; Berg DD; Burke JA; Chaudhry SP; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber D; Horowitz J; Jentzer JC; Katrapati P; Keeley E; Lawler PR; Park JG; Sinha SS; Snell J; Solomon MA; Teuteberg J; Katz JN; van Diepen S; Morrow DA; Am Heart J; 2024 Apr; 270():1-12. PubMed ID: 38190931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Pöss J; Köster J; Fuernau G; Eitel I; de Waha S; Ouarrak T; Lassus J; Harjola VP; Zeymer U; Thiele H; Desch S J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 69(15):1913-1920. PubMed ID: 28408020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential Prognostic Impact of IABP-SHOCK II Scores According to Treatment Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Coronary Syndrome: From the RESCUE Registry. Kim BS; Jang WJ; Choi KH; Kim SH; Yu CW; Jeong JO; Lee HJ; Gwon HC; Kim HJ; Yang JH Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jan; 60(1):. PubMed ID: 38276062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonroutine Use of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction With Successful and Unsuccessful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Hawranek M; Gierlotka M; Pres D; Zembala M; Gąsior M JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(18):1885-1893. PubMed ID: 30236362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Schwarz B; Abdel-Wahab M; Robinson DR; Richardt G Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2016 Nov; 111(8):715-722. PubMed ID: 26596273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlates for mortality in patients presented with acute myocardial infarct complicated by cardiogenic shock. Minha S; Barbash IM; Dvir D; Ben-Dor I; Loh JP; Pendyala LK; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Torguson R; Waksman R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 24444472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock irrespective of the underlying cause - the Cardiogenic Shock Score. Beer BN; Jentzer JC; Weimann J; Dabboura S; Yan I; Sundermeyer J; Kirchhof P; Blankenberg S; Schrage B; Westermann D Eur J Heart Fail; 2022 Apr; 24(4):657-667. PubMed ID: 35119176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? Sanborn TA; Sleeper LA; Bates ER; Jacobs AK; Boland J; French JK; Dens J; Dzavik V; Palmeri ST; Webb JG; Goldberger M; Hochman JS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Sep; 36(3 Suppl A):1123-9. PubMed ID: 10985715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of intra-aortic balloon pump on mortality as a function of cardiogenic shock severity. Jentzer JC; van Diepen S; Henry TD; Baran DA; Barsness GW; Holmes DR Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 34047486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Mortality Risk Models in Patients with Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock and Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support. Chatzis G; Markus B; Syntila S; Waechter C; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Schieffer B; Karatolios K J Interv Cardiol; 2021; 2021():8843935. PubMed ID: 33536855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Outcomes and Cost Associated With an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Miller PE; Bromfield SG; Ma Q; Crawford G; Whitney J; DeVries A; Desai NR JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):926-933. PubMed ID: 35849410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes Between the Use of Impella and IABP in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Jin C; Yandrapalli S; Yang Y; Liu B; Aronow WS; Naidu SS J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):E98-E103. PubMed ID: 35100554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry. Berg DD; Barnett CF; Kenigsberg BB; Papolos A; Alviar CL; Baird-Zars VM; Barsness GW; Bohula EA; Brennan J; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Cremer PC; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber DA; Granger CB; Hollenberg S; Horowitz JM; Gladden JD; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Keller N; Kontos MC; Lawler PR; Menon V; Metkus TS; Miller PE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Newby LK; Park JG; Phreaner N; Roswell RO; Schulman SP; Sinha SS; Snell RJ; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Tymchak W; van Diepen S; Morrow DA Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006635. PubMed ID: 31707801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States. Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock After the SHOCK-II Trial. Nan Tie E; Dinh D; Chan W; Clark DJ; Ajani AE; Brennan A; Dagan M; Cohen N; Oqueli E; Freeman M; Hiew C; Shaw JA; Reid CM; Kaye DM; Stub D; Duffy SJ; Am J Cardiol; 2023 Mar; 191():125-132. PubMed ID: 36682080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Culprit lesion location and outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial. Fuernau G; Fengler K; Desch S; Eitel I; Neumann FJ; Olbrich HG; de Waha A; de Waha S; Richardt G; Hennersdorf M; Empen K; Hambrecht R; Jung C; Böhm M; Pöss J; Strasser RH; Schneider S; Ouarrak T; Schuler G; Werdan K; Zeymer U; Thiele H Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 105(12):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 27378612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]