These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3819168)

  • 1. Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response.
    Elberling C; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 3819168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Normal hearing thresholds for clicks.
    Stapells DR; Picton TW; Smith AD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 7108045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of click rate and electrode orientation on threshold of the auditory brainstem response.
    Sininger YS; Don M
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):880-6. PubMed ID: 2601318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of rate and forward masking on human adult and newborn auditory evoked brainstem response thresholds.
    Lasky RE
    Dev Psychobiol; 1991 Jan; 24(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 2015963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
    Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency-selective auditory brain-stem response in newborns and infants.
    Yamada O; Ashikawa H; Kodera K; Yamane H
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1983 Feb; 109(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 6849670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection efficiency of auditory steady state evoked by modulated noise.
    Santos TS; Silva JJ; Lins OG; Melges DB; Tierra-Criollo CJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():125-31. PubMed ID: 27262450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Hear Res; 1987; 25(2-3):193-204. PubMed ID: 3558128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses using notched noise masking.
    Oates PA; Purdy SC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):995-1009. PubMed ID: 11519624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of the effect of auditory fatigue on the human ear by auditory brain stem responses (ABR). I. Effect of auditory fatigue on temporary threshold shifts of ABR].
    Janczewski G; Kochanek K; Dawidowicz J; Dobrzyński P; Checiński P
    Med Pr; 1988; 39(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 3210960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
    Mühlenberg L; Schade G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of click polarity on ABR threshold.
    Sininger YS; Masuda A
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 2358131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of methods for reducing residual noise in suprathreshold early auditory evoked potential registration].
    Mühler R; von Specht H; Pethe J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jul; 77(7):382-7. PubMed ID: 9743976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory brainstem responses in 10 inbred strains of mice.
    Zhou X; Jen PH; Seburn KL; Frankel WN; Zheng QY
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1091(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 16516865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural interaction in auditory brain-stem responses: effects of masking.
    Dobie RA; Wilson MJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985 Jan; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 2578378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss.
    Maloff ES; Hood LJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 24441741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.