283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3819173)
1. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vowel identification by listeners with hearing impairment in response to variation in formant frequencies.
Molis MR; Leek MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1211-23. PubMed ID: 21297168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
Loizou PC; Poroy O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision strategies of hearing-impaired listeners in spectral shape discrimination.
Lentz JJ; Leek MR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1389-98. PubMed ID: 11931316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.
Leek MR; Summers V
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1796-806. PubMed ID: 8817905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners.
Dreisbach LE; Leek MR; Lentz JJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):910-21. PubMed ID: 16378482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
Arehart KH; King CA; McLean-Mudgett KS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 9430762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vowel identification by amplitude and phase contrast.
Molis MR; Diedesch A; Gallun F; Leek MR
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 14(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 23007720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of signal level and spectral contrast on vowel formant discrimination for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Woodall A; Liu C
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 23221306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The internal representation of spectral contrast in hearing-impaired listeners.
Summers V; Leek MR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3518-28. PubMed ID: 8046143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Lentz JJ; Leek MR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1604-16. PubMed ID: 12656395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of acoustic cues on labeling fricatives and affricates.
Hedrick M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):925-38. PubMed ID: 9263955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
Hedrick MS; Younger MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Hedrick MS; Jesteadt W
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3398-407. PubMed ID: 8914319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of relative and overall amplitude on perception of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Hedrick MS; Schulte L; Jesteadt W
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Sep; 98(3):1292-303. PubMed ID: 7560503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of two voice-separation algorithms using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1236-49. PubMed ID: 3198862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
