149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38192125)
1. Optimization of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Strategies for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Within 20 mm.
Yu Q; Zhang Y; Su Y; Zhao Q; Xiong K; Zhang L; Fang H
Am Surg; 2024 Jun; 90(6):1176-1186. PubMed ID: 38192125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Chen J; Ye J; Zheng X; Chen J
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar; 28(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 38445925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for small rectal neuroendocrine tumor: study protocol of a multicenter open-label randomized control trial (BANDIT trial).
Takada K; Imai K; Yamada T; Ohata K; Kanesaka T; Nagami Y; Yamasaki Y; Kobara H; Inokuchi Y; Chino A; Yamaguchi S; Ikehara H; Kawamura T; Yabuuchi Y; Mizuguchi Y; Ikematsu H; Yokoi C; Hattori S; Ohno K; Yoshizawa Y; Fukuzawa M; Tsuji Y; Konishi J; Yamamura T; Osawa S; Oka S; Hikichi T; Togashi K; Hirasawa K; Uraoka T; Takeuchi Y; Chiba H; Komeda Y; Doyama H; Oba MS; Saito Y
BMC Gastroenterol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):69. PubMed ID: 38331727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for positive resection margins after endoscopic resection for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.
Han L; Li J; Liang C; Chu Y; Wang Y; Lv L; Liu D; Tan Y
Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):2041-2049. PubMed ID: 38429572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using a dual-channel endoscope compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Lee WH; Kim SW; Lim CH; Kim JS; Cho YK; Lee IS; Choi MG; Choi KY
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4313-8. PubMed ID: 23807754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Pan J; Zhang X; Shi Y; Pei Q
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 53(9):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 30193543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resectability of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with a Ligation Band Device and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
Lim HK; Lee SJ; Baek DH; Park DY; Lee BE; Park EY; Park JW; Kim GH; Song GA
Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2019; 2019():8425157. PubMed ID: 31687016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantage of endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; Choi CW; Kim SJ; Nam HS
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 21(31):9387-93. PubMed ID: 26309365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.
Cheung DY; Choi SK; Kim HK; Kim SS; Chae HS; Seo KJ; Cho YS
Surg Endosc; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1500-5. PubMed ID: 25277474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors smaller than 16 mm: a meta-analysis.
Zhang HP; Wu W; Yang S; Lin J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1345-53. PubMed ID: 27367942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of resectability among endoscopic treatment methods for rectal neuroendocrine tumors <10 mm.
Toriyama K; Yamamura T; Nakamura M; Maeda K; Sawada T; Mizutani Y; Ishikawa E; Furukawa K; Ishikawa T; Ohno E; Kawashima H; Fujishiro M
Arab J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jun; 22(2):104-110. PubMed ID: 34053887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic mucosal resection with double band ligation versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Huang JL; Gan RY; Chen ZH; Gao RY; Li DF; Wang LS; Yao J
World J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Mar; 15(3):440-449. PubMed ID: 37032804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The outcomes of modified endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors and the value of endoscopic morphology classification in endoscopic resection.
Wang XY; Chai NL; Linghu EQ; Qiu ST; Li LS; Zou JL; Xiang JY; Li XX
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):200. PubMed ID: 32586282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Lu M; Cui H; Qian M; Shen Y; Zhu J
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2024 May; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38701133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap and endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Zheng X; Wu M; Shi H; Er L; Wang K; Cao Y; Li S
BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):248. PubMed ID: 35761304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: endoscopic submucosal dissection with myectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Sun P; Zheng T; Hu C; Gao T; Ding X
Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6374-6378. PubMed ID: 34231072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EMR-P for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: is it a preferred treatment?
Liu Z; Zheng C; Ding S; Chen C; Yang J; Wu R; Sun D
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Dec; 57(12):1503-1508. PubMed ID: 35758188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic mucosal resection using anchored snare Tip-in versus precut technique for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Hong SW; Yang DH; Lee YJ; Baek DH; Chun J; Kim HG; Kim SJ; Hong SM; Myung DS
Korean J Intern Med; 2024 Mar; 39(2):238-247. PubMed ID: 38062724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a propensity score-matched study.
Park SS; Kim BC; Lee DE; Han KS; Kim B; Hong CW; Sohn DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Aug; 94(2):408-415.e2. PubMed ID: 33600807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Advantages of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device compared to conventional EMR and ESD.
Kamigaichi Y; Yamashita K; Oka S; Tamari H; Shimohara Y; Nishimura T; Inagaki K; Okamoto Y; Tanaka H; Yuge R; Urabe Y; Arihiro K; Tanaka S
DEN Open; 2022 Apr; 2(1):e35. PubMed ID: 35310732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
