These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38192513)

  • 1. Effects of presentation level on speech-on-speech masking by voice-gender difference and spatial separation between talkers.
    Oh Y; Friggle P; Kinder J; Tilbrook G; Bridges SE
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1282764. PubMed ID: 38192513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors underlying masking release by voice-gender differences and spatial separation cues in multi-talker listening environments in listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Oh Y; Hartling CL; Srinivasan NK; Diedesch AC; Gallun FJ; Reiss LAJ
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1059639. PubMed ID: 36507363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interaction between voice-gender difference and spatial separation in release from masking in multi-talker listening environments.
    Oh Y; Bridges SE; Schoenfeld H; Layne AO; Eddins D
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 Aug; 1(8):084404. PubMed ID: 34713273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strength of target source segregation cues affects the outcome of speech-on-speech masking experiments.
    Roverud E; Villard S; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 May; 153(5):2780. PubMed ID: 37140176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Ericson MA; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aging and speech-on-speech masking.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 18091104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J; Wang X; Wang NY; Fu X; Gan T; Galvin JJ; Willis S; Xu K; Thomas M; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming.
    Allen K; Carlile S; Alais D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1562-70. PubMed ID: 18345844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-Related Differences in the Effects of Masker Cuing on Releasing Chinese Speech From Informational Masking.
    Feng T; Chen Q; Xiao Z
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1922. PubMed ID: 30356784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial Release from Masking Using Clinical Corpora: Sentence Recognition in a Colocated or Spatially Separated Speech Masker.
    King G; Corbin NE; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):271-276. PubMed ID: 31589139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Segregation in Active Middle Ear Stimulation: Masking Release With Changing Fundamental Frequency.
    Auinger AB; Liepins R; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 33369941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effects of Uncertainty in Level on Speech-on-Speech Masking.
    Byrne AJ; Conroy C; Kidd G
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221077555. PubMed ID: 35238259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Roverud E; Swaminathan J; Jennings T; Clayton K; Steven Colburn H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):440. PubMed ID: 30710924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.