164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38192980)
1. Use of survival support vector machine combined with random survival forest to predict the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
Xiao Z; Song Q; Wei Y; Fu Y; Huang D; Huang C
Transl Cancer Res; 2023 Dec; 12(12):3581-3590. PubMed ID: 38192980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which model is better in predicting the survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma?: Comparison of the random survival forest based on machine learning algorithms to Cox regression: analyses based on SEER database.
Sun H; Wu S; Li S; Jiang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Mar; 102(10):e33144. PubMed ID: 36897699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Xiao J; Mo M; Wang Z; Zhou C; Shen J; Yuan J; He Y; Zheng Y
JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Feb; 10(2):e33440. PubMed ID: 35179504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized postoperative chemotherapy: A real-world study of distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Wang D; Pan B; Huang JC; Chen Q; Cui SP; Lang R; Lyu SC
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1106029. PubMed ID: 37007095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of nomogram with random survival forest for prediction of survival in patients with spindle cell carcinoma.
Zhang X; Liang J; Du Z; Xie Q; Li T; Tang F
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022 Dec; 18(7):2006-2012. PubMed ID: 36647963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prediction model based on random survival forest analysis of the overall survival of elderly female papillary thyroid carcinoma patients: a SEER-based study.
Lun Y; Yuan H; Ma P; Chen J; Lu P; Wang W; Liang R; Zhang J; Gao W; Ding X; Li S; Wang Z; Guo J; Lu L
Endocrine; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38558373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognosis prediction for glioblastoma multiforme patients using machine learning approaches: Development of the clinically applicable model.
Kim Y; Kim KH; Park J; Yoon HI; Sung W
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109617. PubMed ID: 36921767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A radiomics-based model can predict recurrence-free survival of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative ablation.
Peng W; Jiang X; Zhang W; Hu J; Zhang Y; Zhang L
Asian J Surg; 2023 Jul; 46(7):2689-2696. PubMed ID: 36351862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-based random survival Forest model improves prediction of progression-free survival to induction chemotherapy plus concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Pei W; Wang C; Liao H; Chen X; Wei Y; Huang X; Liang X; Bao H; Su D; Jin G
BMC Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(1):739. PubMed ID: 35794590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new prognostic model of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on Cloud-least squares support vector machine.
Liu K; Shen LQ; Zhang DB; Kang YX; Wang YX; Chen P; Zhang R; Gu BL; Jiao YL; Yuan X; Qi YJ; Gao SG
J Thorac Dis; 2023 Sep; 15(9):4938-4948. PubMed ID: 37868877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of survival prediction models for pancreatic cancer: Cox model versus machine learning models.
Kim H; Park T; Jang J; Lee S
Genomics Inform; 2022 Jun; 20(2):e23. PubMed ID: 35794703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a random survival forest model for predicting long-term survival of early-stage young breast cancer patients based on the SEER database and an external validation cohort.
Li LW; Liu X; Shen ML; Zhao MJ; Liu H
Am J Cancer Res; 2024; 14(4):1609-1621. PubMed ID: 38726282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of machine learning models for identification of predictors of survival and tumour recurrence in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Bezjak M; Kocman B; Jadrijević S; Filipec Kanižaj T; Antonijević M; Dalbelo Bašić B; Mikulić D
Ann Transl Med; 2023 Aug; 11(10):345. PubMed ID: 37675331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A machine learning-based survival prediction model of high grade glioma by integration of clinical and dose-volume histogram parameters.
Chen H; Li C; Zheng L; Lu W; Li Y; Wei Q
Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(8):2774-2786. PubMed ID: 33760360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relative Importance of Clinical and Socio-demographic Variables in Prognostic Prediction in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Variable Importance Approach.
He J; Zhang JX; Chen CT; Ma Y; De Guzman R; Meng J; Pu Y
Med Care; 2020 May; 58(5):461-467. PubMed ID: 31985586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Development of a Prediction Model Based on Random Survival Forest for the Postoperative Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.
Lin J; Yin M; Liu L; Gao J; Yu C; Liu X; Xu C; Zhu J
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Sep; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 36230593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognosis prediction of extremity and trunk wall soft-tissue sarcomas treated with surgical resection with radiomic analysis based on random survival forest.
Yang Y; Ma X; Wang Y; Ding X
Updates Surg; 2022 Feb; 74(1):355-365. PubMed ID: 34003477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application value of machine learning algorithms for predicting recurrence after resection of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma].
Ji GW; Wang K; Xia YX; Li XC; Wang XH
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 59(8):679-685. PubMed ID: 34192861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning-based overall and cancer-specific survival prediction of M0 penile squamous cell carcinoma：A population-based retrospective study.
Chen D; Liang S; Chen J; Li K; Mi H
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23442. PubMed ID: 38163093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Yang X; Qiu H; Wang L; Wang X
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e44417. PubMed ID: 37883174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
