These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38193931)

  • 1. The Impact of Posterior Intervertebral Osteophytes on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Zhao E; Hirase T; Kim AG; Du JY; Amen TB; Araghi K; Subramanian T; Kamil R; Shahi P; Fourman MS; Asada T; Simon CZ; Singh N; Korsun M; Tuma OC; Zhang J; Lu AZ; Mai E; Kim AYE; Allen MRJ; Kwas C; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA; Iyer S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 May; 49(9):652-660. PubMed ID: 38193931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 for an Obese Population.
    Patel MR; Jacob KC; Zamanian C; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    Asian Spine J; 2023 Apr; 17(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35989506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.
    Patel MR; Jacob KC; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Nov; 30(21):e1382-e1390. PubMed ID: 36264190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective observational study.
    Chen H; Zheng G; Bian Z; Hou C; Li M; Zhang Z; Zhu L; Wang X
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 37245051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of intervertebral height and lordosis of fusion segment between open- and minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions].
    Zhang Y; Li F; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Yu Y; Cheng L
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 34(4):422-427. PubMed ID: 32291975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of local steroid application in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Patel DV; Bawa MS; Ahn J; Bohl DD; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(2):222-227. PubMed ID: 30497132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Zhao XB; Ma HJ; Geng B; Zhou HG; Xia YY
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Feb; 13(1):328-337. PubMed ID: 33426744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique.
    Belykh E; Kalinin AA; Martirosyan NL; Kerimbayev T; Theodore N; Preul MC; Byvaltsev VA
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e959-e968. PubMed ID: 29588241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers' compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Massel DH; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):315-323. PubMed ID: 36637505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Chen X; Wu LL; Yang ZC; Qiu YJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 37211931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
    Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yoo JS; Patel DS; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Mogilevsky FA; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jul; 33(6):E263-E268. PubMed ID: 31503049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.