161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38194297)
1. Biomechanical and Vascular Metrics Between Eyes of Patients With Asymmetric Glaucoma and Symmetric Glaucoma.
Harvey DH; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Nuñez FM; Ma Y; Fleming GP
J Glaucoma; 2024 May; 33(5):334-339. PubMed ID: 38194297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with progressive normal-tension glaucoma.
Park JH; Jun RM; Choi KR
Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 99(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 25555704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients.
Wells AP; Garway-Heath DF; Poostchi A; Wong T; Chan KC; Sachdev N
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3262-8. PubMed ID: 18316697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Association Between Ocular Rigidity and Neuroretinal Damage in Glaucoma.
Sayah DN; Mazzaferri J; Descovich D; Costantino S; Lesk MR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 Nov; 61(13):11. PubMed ID: 33151280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal Biomechanics and Visual Field Progression in Eyes with Seemingly Well-Controlled Intraocular Pressure.
Susanna BN; Ogata NG; Jammal AA; Susanna CN; Berchuck SI; Medeiros FA
Ophthalmology; 2019 Dec; 126(12):1640-1646. PubMed ID: 31519385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association between corneal biomechanical properties and optic nerve head morphology in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.
Prata TS; Lima VC; Guedes LM; Biteli LG; Teixeira SH; de Moraes CG; Ritch R; Paranhos A
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(7):682-8. PubMed ID: 22429725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of optic nerve head topography and visual field in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Boland MV; Zhang L; Broman AT; Jampel HD; Quigley HA
Ophthalmology; 2008 Feb; 115(2):239-245.e2. PubMed ID: 18082888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.
Vinciguerra R; Rehman S; Vallabh NA; Batterbury M; Czanner G; Choudhary A; Cheeseman R; Elsheikh A; Willoughby CE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between corneal hysteresis and optic nerve parameters measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
Vu DM; Silva FQ; Haseltine SJ; Ehrlich JR; Radcliffe NM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 251(7):1777-83. PubMed ID: 23519885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining corneal hysteresis with central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure for glaucoma risk assessment.
Pensyl D; Sullivan-Mee M; Torres-Monte M; Halverson K; Qualls C
Eye (Lond); 2012 Oct; 26(10):1349-56. PubMed ID: 22878449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Asymmetric Visual Field Damage in Patients with Untreated Normal Tension Glaucoma.
Li BB; Cai Y; Pan YZ; Li M; Qiao RH; Fang Y; Tian T
Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 Feb; 130(3):334-339. PubMed ID: 28139518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between Corneal Deformation Amplitude and Posterior Pole Profiles in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Jung Y; Park HY; Park CK
Ophthalmology; 2016 May; 123(5):959-64. PubMed ID: 26875001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.
Grewal DS; Sehi M; Greenfield DS
Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 127(11):1442-8. PubMed ID: 19901209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Relationship Between Asymmetries of Corneal Properties and Rates of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients.
Estrela T; Jammal AA; Mariottoni EB; Urata CN; Ogata NG; Berchuck SI; Medeiros FA
J Glaucoma; 2020 Oct; 29(10):872-877. PubMed ID: 32769735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Corneal Stiffness Parameters Are Predictive of Structural and Functional Progression in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes.
Qassim A; Mullany S; Abedi F; Marshall H; Hassall MM; Kolovos A; Knight LSW; Nguyen T; Awadalla MS; Chappell A; Schulz AM; Galanopoulos A; Agar A; Healey PR; Hewitt AW; Graham SL; Landers J; Casson RJ; Siggs OM; Craig JE
Ophthalmology; 2021 Jul; 128(7):993-1004. PubMed ID: 33245936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
