124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38194487)
21. Direct comparison of low-dose-rate brachytherapy versus radical prostatectomy using the surgical definition of biochemical recurrence for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Tsumura H; Tanaka N; Oguchi T; Owari T; Nakai Y; Asakawa I; Iijima K; Kato H; Hashida I; Tabata KI; Satoh T; Ishiyama H
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Apr; 17(1):71. PubMed ID: 35410307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Timing of Prostate-specific Antigen Nadir After Radical Prostatectomy and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence.
Skove SL; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Moreira DM; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2017 Oct; 108():129-134. PubMed ID: 28735016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predicting participation in and successful outcome of a penile rehabilitation programme using a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor with a vacuum erection device after radical prostatectomy.
Kimura M; Caso JR; Bañez LL; Koontz BF; Gerber L; Senocak C; Donatucci CF; Vujaskovic Z; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E931-8. PubMed ID: 22520165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate-specific antigen measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Inoue H; Nishimura K; Yamaguchi S; Nonomura N; Hara T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Feb; 20(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 24652165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies.
Briganti A; Joniau S; Gandaglia G; Cozzarini C; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Hinkelbein W; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):960-7. PubMed ID: 24351411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical evaluation of a novel method for the measurement of prostate-specific antigen, AccuPSA(TM) , as a predictor of 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy: results of a pilot study.
Lepor H; Cheli CD; Thiel RP; Taneja SS; Laze J; Chan DW; Sokoll LJ; Mangold L; Partin AW
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1770-5. PubMed ID: 21992499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of MRI-Based Staging and Pathologic Staging for Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
Merriman KM; Harmon SA; Belue MJ; Yilmaz EC; Blake Z; Lay NS; Phelps TE; Merino MJ; Parnes HL; Law YM; Gurram S; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Dec; 221(6):773-787. PubMed ID: 37404084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-year postoperative ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen following open radical retropubic prostatectomy is a predictor for delayed biochemical recurrence.
Malik RD; Goldberg JD; Hochman T; Lepor H
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):548-53. PubMed ID: 21652145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are biochemical recurrence outcomes similar after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy? Analysis of prostate cancer-specific mortality by nomogram-predicted risks of biochemical recurrence.
Lee BH; Kibel AS; Ciezki JP; Klein EA; Reddy CA; Yu C; Kattan MW; Stephenson AJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 25294696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Association of Cigarette Smoking and Smoking Cessation with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer in Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.
Rieken M; Shariat SF; Kluth LA; Fajkovic H; Rink M; Karakiewicz PI; Seitz C; Briganti A; Rouprêt M; Loidl W; Trinh QD; Bachmann A; Pourmand G
Eur Urol; 2015 Dec; 68(6):949-56. PubMed ID: 26050111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Back to baseline: erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy from the patients' perspective.
Nelson CJ; Scardino PT; Eastham JA; Mulhall JP
J Sex Med; 2013 Jun; 10(6):1636-43. PubMed ID: 23551767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective analysis of penile length changes after radical prostatectomy.
Berookhim BM; Nelson CJ; Kunzel B; Mulhall JP; Narus JB
BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5b):E131-6. PubMed ID: 24053766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Van den Broeck T; van den Bergh RCN; Arfi N; Gross T; Moris L; Briers E; Cumberbatch M; De Santis M; Tilki D; Fanti S; Fossati N; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; Lardas M; Liew M; Rouvière O; Pecanka J; Mason MD; Schoots IG; van Der Kwast TH; van Der Poel HG; Wiegel T; Willemse PM; Yuan Y; Lam TB; Cornford P; Mottet N
Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):967-987. PubMed ID: 30342843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. PSA density does not improve predictive accuracy of the UCSF-CAPRA score.
Parker R; Bell A; Chang K; Greenberg S; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Prostate; 2023 Jul; 83(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 37078628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What is the optimal definition of misclassification in patients with very low-risk prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance? Results from a multi-institutional series.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Isbarn H; Suardi N; De Visschere PJ; Futterer JJ; Ghadjar P; Massard C; Ost P; Sooriakumaran P; Surcel CI; van der Bergh RC; Montorsi F; Ficarra V; Giannarini G; Briganti A;
Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25620154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease.
Badani KK; Reddy BN; Moskowitz EJ; Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Martini A; Whalen MJ; Skarecky DW; Huynh LM; Ahlering TE
Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):310.e1-310.e6. PubMed ID: 29625782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk classification in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study in Chinese prostate cancer patients.
Xu H; Zhu Y; Dai B; Ye DW
Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(6):551-554. PubMed ID: 30027928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
