These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38196346)

  • 1. Comparison of holotomographic microscopy and coherence-controlled holographic microscopy.
    Chvalova V; Vomastek T; Grousl T
    J Microsc; 2024 Apr; 294(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 38196346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A practical criterion for focusing of unstained cell samples using a digital holographic microscope.
    Malik R; Sharma P; Poulose S; Ahlawat S; Khare K
    J Microsc; 2020 Aug; 279(2):114-122. PubMed ID: 32441768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated classification of cell morphology by coherence-controlled holographic microscopy.
    Strbkova L; Zicha D; Vesely P; Chmelik R
    J Biomed Opt; 2017 Aug; 22(8):1-9. PubMed ID: 28836416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic phase differences based on quantitative phase imaging for the objective evaluation of cell behavior.
    Krizova A; Collakova J; Dostal Z; Kvasnica L; Uhlirova H; Zikmund T; Vesely P; Chmelik R
    J Biomed Opt; 2015; 20(11):111214. PubMed ID: 26340954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Label-free observation of three-dimensional morphology change of a single PC12 cell by digital holographic microscopy.
    Mir TA; Shinohara H
    Anal Biochem; 2012 Oct; 429(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 22796499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Label-Free Digital Holographic Microscopy for In Vitro Cytotoxic Effect Quantification of Organic Nanoparticles.
    Eder KM; Marzi A; Barroso Á; Ketelhut S; Kemper B; Schnekenburger J
    Cells; 2022 Feb; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 35203295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Label-free three-dimensional imaging and quantitative analysis of living fibroblasts and myofibroblasts by holotomographic microscopy.
    Sbrana F; Chellini F; Tani A; Parigi M; Garella R; Palmieri F; Zecchi-Orlandini S; Squecco R; Sassoli C
    Microsc Res Tech; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38984377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of Fresnel biprism-based digital holographic microscopy in quantitative phase imaging.
    Hayes-Rounds C; Bogue-Jimenez B; Garcia-Sucerquia J; Skalli O; Doblas A
    J Biomed Opt; 2020 Aug; 25(8):1-11. PubMed ID: 32755077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital in-line holographic microscopy for label-free identification and tracking of biological cells.
    Kim J; Lee SJ
    Mil Med Res; 2024 Jun; 11(1):38. PubMed ID: 38867274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Label-free, high-throughput holographic imaging to evaluate mammalian gametes and embryos†.
    Wheeler MB; Rabel RAC; Rubessa M; Popescu G
    Biol Reprod; 2024 Jun; 110(6):1125-1134. PubMed ID: 38733568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Movies of cellular and sub-cellular motion by digital holographic microscopy.
    Mann CJ; Yu L; Kim MK
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Mar; 5():21. PubMed ID: 16556319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moving grating-based laser heterodyne digital holographic microscopy system for measuring dynamic phase of living cell attachment.
    Wang P; Wu S; Zhang X; Qin B; Feng G
    J Biophotonics; 2024 Mar; 17(3):e202300355. PubMed ID: 38010123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative phase imaging through scattering media by means of coherence-controlled holographic microscope.
    Kollarova V; Collakova J; Dostal Z; Vesely P; Chmelik R
    J Biomed Opt; 2015; 20(11):111206. PubMed ID: 26244853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate single-shot quantitative phase imaging of biological specimens with telecentric digital holographic microscopy.
    Doblas A; Sánchez-Ortiga E; Martínez-Corral M; Saavedra G; Garcia-Sucerquia J
    J Biomed Opt; 2014 Apr; 19(4):046022. PubMed ID: 24781590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interlaboratory evaluation of a digital holographic microscopy-based assay for label-free in vitro cytotoxicity testing of polymeric nanocarriers.
    Marzi A; Eder KM; Barroso Á; Wågbø AM; Mørch Ý; Hatletveit AR; Visnes T; Schmid RB; Klinkenberg G; Kemper B; Schnekenburger J
    Drug Deliv Transl Res; 2022 Sep; 12(9):2207-2224. PubMed ID: 35799027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital holographic microscopy: a quantitative label-free microscopy technique for phenotypic screening.
    Rappaz B; Breton B; Shaffer E; Turcatti G
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2014 Jan; 17(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 24152227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coherence-controlled holographic microscope.
    Kolman P; Chmelík R
    Opt Express; 2010 Oct; 18(21):21990-2003. PubMed ID: 20941100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample and substrate preparation for exploring living neurons in culture with quantitative-phase imaging.
    Lévesque SA; Mugnes JM; Bélanger E; Marquet P
    Methods; 2018 Mar; 136():90-107. PubMed ID: 29438830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Morphometric analysis of aerobic Eimeria bovis sporogony using live cell 3D holotomographic microscopy imaging.
    Lopez-Osorio S; Velasquez ZD; Conejeros I; Taubert A; Hermosilla C
    Parasitol Res; 2022 Apr; 121(4):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 34633548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative phase imaging for cell culture quality control.
    Kastl L; Isbach M; Dirksen D; Schnekenburger J; Kemper B
    Cytometry A; 2017 May; 91(5):470-481. PubMed ID: 28264140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.