These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38197140)

  • 1. Comparison between direct and indirect "digital image" dental visual shade matching considering the effect of clinical experience and gender.
    Makhloota M; Köroğlu A; Turhan Bal B; Velioğlu N
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jun; 36(6):827-837. PubMed ID: 38197140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Dental Shade Guides and Experience on the Accuracy of Shade Matching.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Amirinejad S; Alavi S; Rajatihaghi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 27084858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Implementation of Elaborative Feedback for Qualitative Improvement of Shade Matching-A Randomized Study.
    Olms C; Jakstat HA; Haak R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Sep; 28(5):277-286. PubMed ID: 27534729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods.
    Bahannan SA
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24252802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of an educational method to improve the shade-matching ability of dental students.
    Chakrabortty K; Wadkar A; Mustaffa HG; Gupta C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):815.e1-815.e9. PubMed ID: 33678442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating factors that affect the shade-matching ability of dentists, dental staff members and laypeople.
    Capa N; Malkondu O; Kazazoglu E; Calikkocaoglu S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jan; 141(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 20045824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of individual education and training on quality of color matching in dentistry.
    Ristic IS; Boskovic M; Gonzalez MD; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 37086204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
    Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of background/surrounding area on accuracy of visual color matching.
    Dudea D; Gasparik C; Botos A; Alb F; Irimie A; Paravina RD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jul; 20(6):1167-73. PubMed ID: 26459306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.