132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38198308)
1. The use of rubber dam in the survival of RMGIC restorations in primary molars: a 30-month randomized controlled clinical trial.
Brum VDS; Borges MLV; Santos NMD; Kaufmann C; Rodrigues JA
Braz Oral Res; 2024; 38():e009. PubMed ID: 38198308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation on composite resin restorations' survival in primary molars: 2-year results from a non-inferiority clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Moro BLP; Tedesco TK; Freitas RD; Pássaro AL; Garbim JR; Oliveira R; Mendes FM; ; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):440. PubMed ID: 36217147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.
Hatirli H; Yasa B; Çelik EU
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients.
Miao C; Yang X; Wong MC; Zou J; Zhou X; Li C; Wang Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(5):CD009858. PubMed ID: 33998662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Hesse D; de Araujo MP; Olegário IC; Innes N; Raggio DP; Bonifácio CC
Trials; 2016 Mar; 17():169. PubMed ID: 27029801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are RMGIC restorations as effective with or without selective caries removal in primary molars?
Gibbison R; Crozier R
Evid Based Dent; 2021 Dec; 22(4):132-133. PubMed ID: 34916637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of different restorative treatments for deep caries lesion in primary teeth (CEPECO 1) - study protocol for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial.
da Silva GSQ; Raggio DP; Machado GFR; Mello-Moura ACV; Gimenez T; Floriano I; Tedesco TK
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30621659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sealing of cavitated occlusal carious lesions in the dentine of deciduous molars: a two-year randomised controlled clinical trial.
Dos Santos NM; Leal SC; Gouvea DB; Sarti CS; Toniolo J; Neves M; Rodrigues JA
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 34286398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized controlled clinical trial of glass carbomer restorations in Class II cavities in primary molars: 12-month results.
El-Housseiny AA; Alamoudi NM; Nouri S; Felemban O
Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(7):522-532. PubMed ID: 31134226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.
Koc Vural U; Kerimova L; Kiremitci A
Odontology; 2021 Apr; 109(2):376-384. PubMed ID: 32902766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do composite restorations in primary molar teeth have a higher survival rate following total or selective caries removal?
Goldsmith R; Taylor G; Waterhouse P
Evid Based Dent; 2021 Jan; 22(1):38-39. PubMed ID: 33772134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rubber dam may increase the survival time of dental restorations.
Keys W; Carson SJ
Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 28338026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-year performance of a nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class II primary molar restorations.
Dermata A; Papageorgiou SN; Kotsanos N
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2021 Jun; 22(3):425-432. PubMed ID: 33201411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New Dual-cure Resin-based Material in Occlusal and Occluso-proximal Restorations of Primary Teeth: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
da Cunha CMBL; Wambier LM; Matos TP; Malaquias P; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Wambier DS; Chibinski ACR
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 35528486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial.
Maru VP; Kulkarni P; Chauhan R; Bapat SS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 36260469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
