147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38198441)
1. Prevalence of childfree adults before and after Dobbs v Jackson in Michigan (USA).
Neal JW; Neal ZP
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0294459. PubMed ID: 38198441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.
Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence and characteristics of childfree adults in Michigan (USA).
Watling Neal J; Neal ZP
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252528. PubMed ID: 34133450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD
JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
Zhu DT; Zhao L; Alzoubi T; Shenin N; Baskaran T; Tikhonov J; Wang C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0288947. PubMed ID: 38551970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision.
Willis MD; Hoffman MN; Wang TR; Sabbath EL; Kuriyama AS; Wesselink AK; Wise LA
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38666636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
Clark BR
Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anxiety and Depression Symptoms After the Dobbs Abortion Decision.
Thornburg B; Kennedy-Hendricks A; Rosen JD; Eisenberg MD
JAMA; 2024 Jan; 331(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 38261045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.
Goodwin G; Marra E; Ramdin C; Alexander AB; Ye PP; Nelson LS; Mazer-Amirshahi M
Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 70():90-95. PubMed ID: 37245403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Case of Restrictions on Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care.
Easter SR; Johnson CT
NEJM Evid; 2023 Jan; 2(1):EVIDe2200294. PubMed ID: 38320058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-Term Changes in Vasectomy Consults and Procedures Following
Zhu A; Nam CS; Gingrich D; Patel N; Black K; Andino JJ; Daignault-Newton S; Telang J; Dupree JM; Quallich S; Ohl D; Hadj-Moussa M
Urol Pract; 2024 May; 11(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 38315830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From Constitutional Protections to Medical Ethics: The Future of Pregnant Patients' Medical Self-Determination Rights After
Sawicki NN; Kukura E
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):528-532. PubMed ID: 38088598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey.
Crawford BL; Simmons MK; Turner RC; Lo WJ; Jozkowski KN
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2023 Sep; 55(3):153-164. PubMed ID: 37475195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Managing Undesired Pregnancy After Dobbs.
Casas RS; Horvath SK; Schwarz EB; Bachorik AE; Chuang CC
J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Dec; 37(16):4272-4275. PubMed ID: 36220947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.
Macklin R
Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The criminalisation of women's healthcare in the post-Dobbs era: an analysis of the anti-abortion trigger law statutes.
Domanski K; Allswede M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2023 Oct; 28(5):258-262. PubMed ID: 37590051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
