170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38199004)
21. Oncoplastic breast surgery for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): is it oncologically safe? A retrospective cohort analysis.
De Lorenzi F; Di Bella J; Maisonneuve P; Rotmensz N; Corso G; Orecchia R; Colleoni M; Mazzarol G; Rietjens M; Loschi P; Marcelli S; Veronesi P; Galimberti V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):957-962. PubMed ID: 29759643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates.
Crown A; Wechter DG; Grumley JW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3363-8. PubMed ID: 26208579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Resection margins and local recurrences in breast cancer: Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.
Niinikoski L; Leidenius MHK; Vaara P; Voynov A; Heikkilä P; Mattson J; Meretoja TJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 30795953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of clinicopathologic, cosmetic and quality of life outcomes in 700 oncoplastic and conventional breast-conserving surgery cases: A single-centre retrospective study.
Kelemen P; Pukancsik D; Újhelyi M; Sávolt Á; Kovács E; Ivády G; Kenessey I; Kovács T; Stamatiou A; Smanykó V; Mátrai Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):118-124. PubMed ID: 30352766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery is associated with a lower rate of surgical site complications compared to standard breast conserving surgery.
Crown A; Scovel LG; Rocha FG; Scott EJ; Wechter DG; Grumley JW
Am J Surg; 2019 Jan; 217(1):138-141. PubMed ID: 30049436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival, Local Recurrence, and Nipple-Areolar Recurrence in the Setting of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
De La Cruz L; Moody AM; Tappy EE; Blankenship SA; Hecht EM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3241-9. PubMed ID: 26242363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patterns of invasive recurrence among patients originally treated for ductal carcinoma in situ by breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy.
Pawloski KR; Tadros AB; Sevilimedu V; Newman A; Gentile L; Zabor EC; Morrow M; Van Zee KJ; Kirstein LJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Apr; 186(3):617-624. PubMed ID: 33675490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nipple-sparing mastectomy as treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: A 10-year follow-up study.
Lago V; Maisto V; Gimenez-Climent J; Vila J; Vazquez C; Estevan R
Breast J; 2018 May; 24(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 29139613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Literature Review.
De La Cruz L; Blankenship SA; Chatterjee A; Geha R; Nocera N; Czerniecki BJ; Tchou J; Fisher CS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3247-58. PubMed ID: 27357177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: patient satisfaction and clinical outcome.
Salhab M; Al Sarakbi W; Joseph A; Sheards S; Travers J; Mokbel K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2006 Feb; 11(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 16508729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for patients with breast carcinoma associated with nipple discharge.
Cabioglu N; Krishnamurthy S; Kuerer HM; Hunt KK; Singletary SE; Meric-Bernstam F; Ross MI; Feig BW; Ames FC; Babiera GV
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):508-17. PubMed ID: 15274063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of oncoplastic reduction techniques to reconstruct partial mastectomy defects in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Song HM; Styblo TM; Carlson GW; Losken A
Breast J; 2010; 16(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 20102367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Oncological Safety of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Extensive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Tamminen A; Meretoja T; Koskivuo I
J Surg Res; 2022 Nov; 279():25-32. PubMed ID: 35717793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer is associated with high patient satisfaction and safe oncological outcomes.
Mesdag V; Régis C; Tresch E; Chauvet MP; Boulanger L; Collinet P; Giard S
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 46(8):637-642. PubMed ID: 28690051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease.
Burdge EC; Yuen J; Hardee M; Gadgil PV; Das C; Henry-Tillman R; Ochoa D; Korourian S; Suzanne Klimberg V
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3294-302. PubMed ID: 23975304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term Results After Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer: A 10-year Follow-up.
Clough KB; van la Parra RFD; Thygesen HH; Levy E; Russ E; Halabi NM; Sarfati I; Nos C
Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 28448389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of margin involvement and local recurrence after skin-sparing and simple mastectomy.
Al-Himdani S; Timbrell S; Tan KT; Morris J; Bundred NJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 42(7):935-41. PubMed ID: 27256869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How to compare the oncological safety of oncoplastic breast conservation surgery - To wide local excision or mastectomy?
Mansell J; Weiler-Mithoff E; Martin J; Khan A; Stallard S; Doughty JC; Romics L
Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):497-501. PubMed ID: 26009307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients.
Kosasih S; Tayeh S; Mokbel K; Kasem A
Am J Surg; 2020 Aug; 220(2):385-392. PubMed ID: 31926592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
