151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38199478)
1. Personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A comparative analysis of international, national, and regional guidelines.
Ramirez-Vazquez R; Escobar I; Vandenbosch GAE; Arribas E
Environ Res; 2024 Apr; 246():118124. PubMed ID: 38199478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits.
Urbinello D; Joseph W; Huss A; Verloock L; Beekhuizen J; Vermeulen R; Martens L; Röösli M
Environ Int; 2014 Jul; 68():49-54. PubMed ID: 24704639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. International policy and advisory response regarding children's exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF).
Redmayne M
Electromagn Biol Med; 2016; 35(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 26091083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
Roy CR; Martin LJ
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radio frequency electromagnetic fields: mild hyperthermia and safety standards.
D'Andrea JA; Ziriax JM; Adair ER
Prog Brain Res; 2007; 162():107-35. PubMed ID: 17645917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial and temporal assessment of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields emitted by smart meters and smart meter banks in urban environments.
Aerts S; Van den Bossche M; Vergara X; Odie S; Verloock L; Martens L; Joseph W
Environ Res; 2020 Apr; 183():109196. PubMed ID: 32032814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radio Hazard Safety Assessment for Marine Ship Transmitters: Measurements Using a New Data Collection Method and Comparison with ICNIRP and ARPANSA Limits.
Halgamuge MN
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 May; 12(5):5338-54. PubMed ID: 25996887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 3. Exposure standards, public policy, laws, and future directions.
Levitt BB; Lai HC; Manville AM
Rev Environ Health; 2022 Dec; 37(4):531-558. PubMed ID: 34563106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Georeferencing of Personal Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields from Wi-Fi in a University Area.
Ramirez-Vazquez R; Arabasi S; Al-Taani H; Sbeih S; Gonzalez-Rubio J; Escobar I; Arribas E
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32183369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protection of Workers Exposed to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields: A Perspective on Open Questions in the Context of the New ICNIRP 2020 Guidelines.
Jeschke P; Alteköster C; Hansson Mild K; Israel M; Ivanova M; Schiessl K; Shalamanova T; Soyka F; Stam R; Wilén J
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():875946. PubMed ID: 35757616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exposure assessment of radio frequency electromagnetic field levels in hospitals of Samsun Province, Turkey.
Kurnaz C; Aygun T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Sep; 27(27):34005-34017. PubMed ID: 32557061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controversy in Electromagnetic Safety.
Chou CK
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs.
Repacholi MH
Bioelectromagnetics; 1998; 19(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 9453702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.
International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF)
Environ Health; 2022 Oct; 21(1):92. PubMed ID: 36253855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation-COMAR Technical Information Statement: Health and Safety Issues Concerning Exposure of the General Public to Electromagnetic Energy from 5G Wireless Communications Networks.
Bushberg JT; Chou CK; Foster KR; Kavet R; Maxson DP; Tell RA; Ziskin MC
Health Phys; 2020 Aug; 119(2):236-246. PubMed ID: 32576739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limiting exposure to radiofrequency radiation: the principles and possible criteria for health protection.
Hinrikus H; Koppel T; Lass J; Roosipuu P; Bachmann M
Int J Radiat Biol; 2023; 99(8):1167-1177. PubMed ID: 36525560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. COMAR technical information statement: expert reviews on potential health effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and comments on the bioinitiative report.
Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR)
Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):348-56. PubMed ID: 19741364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comprehensive radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements and assessments: a city center example.
Kurnaz C; Mutlu M
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 May; 192(6):334. PubMed ID: 32382839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personal Exposure Assessment to Wi-Fi Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in Mexican Microenvironments.
Ramirez-Vazquez R; Gonzalez-Rubio J; Escobar I; Suarez Rodriguez CDP; Arribas E
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33673014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of radiofrequency power density distribution around GSM and broadcast antenna masts in Lagos City, Nigeria.
Ibitoye ZA; Aweda AM
Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2011; 21(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21913539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
