These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38200204)

  • 21. Meta-analysis of the effect of natural frequencies on Bayesian reasoning.
    McDowell M; Jacobs P
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Dec; 143(12):1273-1312. PubMed ID: 29048176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Children can solve Bayesian problems: the role of representation in mental computation.
    Zhu L; Gigerenzer G
    Cognition; 2006 Jan; 98(3):287-308. PubMed ID: 16399266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Possibility of solving complex problems by recursive thinking].
    Hayashi H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Jun; 73(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 12199063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.
    Tenenbaum JB; Griffiths TL; Kemp C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Information Formats and Incidental Affect on Prior and Posterior Probability Judgments.
    Armstrong BA; Sparrow EP; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jul; 40(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 32659157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experiencing statistical information improves children's and adults' inferences.
    Schulze C; Hertwig R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2302-2313. PubMed ID: 35650464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How to train your Bayesian: a problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25283723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1208-15. PubMed ID: 26148720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Physician Bayesian updating from personal beliefs about the base rate and likelihood ratio.
    Rottman BM
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):270-280. PubMed ID: 27752962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.
    Lassiter D; Goodman ND
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():123-34. PubMed ID: 25497521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving Bayesian Reasoning: The Effects of Phrasing, Visualization, and Spatial Ability.
    Ottley A; Peck EM; Harrison LT; Afergan D; Ziemkiewicz C; Taylor HA; Han PK; Chang R
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2016 Jan; 22(1):529-38. PubMed ID: 26390491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fronto-insular-parietal network engagement underlying arithmetic word problem solving.
    Chang TT; Lung TC; Ng CT; Metcalfe AWS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Apr; 40(6):1927-1941. PubMed ID: 30565340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Which cognitive individual differences predict good Bayesian reasoning? Concurrent comparisons of underlying abilities.
    Brase G
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):235-248. PubMed ID: 32815106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Perham N; Over DE; Thompson VA
    Cognition; 2000 Dec; 77(3):197-213. PubMed ID: 11018509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A description-experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups.
    Schulze C; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104580. PubMed ID: 33667974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A computational analysis of the neural bases of Bayesian inference.
    Kolossa A; Kopp B; Fingscheidt T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():222-37. PubMed ID: 25462794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nurses as information providers: facilitating understanding and communication of statistical information.
    Hanoch Y; Pachur T
    Nurse Educ Today; 2004 Apr; 24(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 15046859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.