127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38204600)
1. Safety and Feasibility Using a Fluid-Filled Wire to Avoid Hydrostatic Errors in Physiological Intracoronary Measurements.
Råmunddal T; Dworeck C; Torild P; Andréen S; Gan LM; Hirlekar G; Ioanes D; Myredal A; Odenstedt J; Petursson P; Pylova T; Töpel F; Völz S; Hilmersson M; Redfors B; Angerås O
Cardiol Res Pract; 2024; 2024():6664482. PubMed ID: 38204600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fluid-filled versus sensor-tipped pressure guidewires for FFR and P
Eerdekens R; Tonino PAL; Zimmermann FM; Teeuwen K; Vlaar PJ; de Waard GA; van Royen N; van Nunen LX
Int J Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 406():131998. PubMed ID: 38555057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure Variations Caused by Height Differences in Supine and Prone Positions on Fractional Flow Reserve Values in the Coronary Circulation.
Kawaguchi Y; Ito K; Kin H; Shirai Y; Okazaki A; Miyajima K; Watanabe T; Tatsuguchi M; Wakabayashi Y; Maekawa Y
J Interv Cardiol; 2019; 2019():4532862. PubMed ID: 31772532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of hydrostatic pressure on fractional flow reserve: in vivo experimental study of anatomical height difference of coronary arteries.
Nagamatsu S; Sakamoto K; Yamashita T; Sato R; Tabata N; Motozato K; Yamanaga K; Ito M; Fujisue K; Kanazawa H; Sueta D; Usuku H; Araki S; Arima Y; Takashio S; Suzuki S; Yamamoto E; Izumiya Y; Soejima H; Utsunomiya D; Kaikita K; Yamashita Y; Tsujita K
J Cardiol; 2020 Jul; 76(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 32089479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential effects of the hydrostatic pressure gradient on hyperemic and nonhyperemic pressure ratios.
Florie NHM; Eerdekens R; Manzi MV; Heinrichs E; van 't Veer M; van Royen N; Tonino PAL; van Nunen LX
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2023 Sep; 325(3):H562-H568. PubMed ID: 37477689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transstenotic coronary pressure gradient measurement in humans: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a new pressure monitoring angioplasty guide wire.
De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Paulus WJ; Vantrimpont PJ; Sys SU; Heyndrickx GR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jul; 22(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 8509531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FFR pressure wire comparative study: piezoresistive versus optical sensor.
Cottens D; Maeremans J; Vrolix M; Van Lierde J; Dens J; Ferdinande B
Acta Cardiol; 2022 Jun; 77(4):322-327. PubMed ID: 34218723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Coronary Anatomy and Hydrostatic Pressure on Intracoronary Indices of Stenosis Severity.
Härle T; Luz M; Meyer S; Kronberg K; Nickau B; Escaned J; Davies J; Elsässer A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 10(8):764-773. PubMed ID: 28365266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vivo.
Härle T; Luz M; Meyer S; Vahldiek F; van der Harst P; van Dijk R; Ties D; Escaned J; Davies J; Elsässer A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Mar; 107(3):222-232. PubMed ID: 29098379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison study between a newly developed optical-based fractional flow reserve device and the conventional fractional flow reserve device.
Saka Y; Tanaka A; Ishii H; Takashima H; Suzuki A; Nakano Y; Sakurai S; Ando H; Murohara T; Amano T
Coron Artery Dis; 2020 Jun; 31(4):342-347. PubMed ID: 31913164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of hydrostatic pressure on the result of physiological measurements in various coronary segments.
Üveges Á; Tar B; Jenei C; Czuriga D; Papp Z; Csanádi Z; Kőszegi Z
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jan; 37(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 32804319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FFR pressure wire comparative study for drift: piezo resistive versus optical sensor.
Cottens D; Ferdinande B; Polad J; Vrolix M; Ameloot K; Hendrickx I; Poels E; Maeremans J; Dens J
Am J Cardiovasc Dis; 2022; 12(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 35291508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phasic pressure measurements for coronary and valvular interventions using fluid-filled catheters: Errors, automated correction, and clinical implications.
Johnson DT; Fournier S; Kirkeeide RL; De Bruyne B; Gould KL; Johnson NP
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 96(3):E268-E277. PubMed ID: 32077561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a Pressure Wire for Automatically Correcting Artifacts in Phasic Pressure Tracings From a Fluid-Filled Catheter.
Johnson DT; Svanerud J; Ahn JM; Bezerra HG; Collison D; van 't Veer M; Hennigan B; De Bruyne B; Kirkeeide RL; Gould KL; Johnson NP
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Jan; 46():98-105. PubMed ID: 35918253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pressure wire compared to microcatheter sensing for coronary fractional flow reserve: the PERFORM study.
Ali ZA; Parviz Y; Brinkman M; Matsumura M; Redfors B; Brogno DA; Corral MD; Fall KN; Mintz GS; Stone GW; Maehara A; Jeremias A; Kirtane AJ
EuroIntervention; 2018 Jul; 14(4):e459-e466. PubMed ID: 29769168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pressure- and 3D-Derived Coronary Flow Reserve with Hydrostatic Pressure Correction: Comparison with Intracoronary Doppler Measurements.
Tar B; Ágoston A; Üveges Á; Szabó GT; Szűk T; Komócsi A; Czuriga D; Csippa B; Paál G; Kőszegi Z
J Pers Med; 2022 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resting Pd/Pa measured with intracoronary pressure wire strongly predicts fractional flow reserve.
Mamas MA; Horner S; Welch E; Ashworth A; Millington S; Fraser D; Fath-Ordoubadi F; Neyses L; El-Omar M
J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 22(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 20516504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans.
Pijls NH; De Bruyne B; Smith L; Aarnoudse W; Barbato E; Bartunek J; Bech GJ; Van De Vosse F
Circulation; 2002 May; 105(21):2482-6. PubMed ID: 12034653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.
Jeremias A; Whitbourn RJ; Filardo SD; Fitzgerald PJ; Cohen DJ; Tuzcu EM; Anderson WD; Abizaid AA; Mintz GS; Yeung AC; Kern MJ; Yock PG
Am Heart J; 2000 Oct; 140(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 11011341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the Accuracy of a Second-Generation Optical Sensor Pressure Wire in a Wire-to-Wire Comparison (The ACCURACY Study).
Haddad K; Potter BJ; Matteau A; Potvin J; Masson JB; Pilon C; Vu-Hung Q; Gobeil F; Mansour S
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Feb; 35():51-56. PubMed ID: 33775553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
